Martin v. Löwis wrote:
[snip]
To convert non-decodable bytes, a new error handler python-escape is
introduced, which decodes non-decodable bytes using into a private-use
character U+F01xx, which is believed to not conflict with private-use
characters that currently exist in Python codecs.
The
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
[snip]
To convert non-decodable bytes, a new error handler python-escape is
introduced, which decodes non-decodable bytes using into a private-use
character U+F01xx, which is believed to not conflict with private-use
characters
Hi,
I've recently subscribed to this list and received my first Summary of
Python tracker Issues. What I find annoying are the dates, for example:
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (04/17/09 - 04/24/09)
3 x double-digits (have we learned nothing from Y2K? :-)) with the
_middle_ ones changing fastest!
I
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
If the bytes are mapped to single half surrogate codes instead of the
normal pairs (low+high), then I can see that decoding could never be
ambiguous and encoding could produce the original bytes.
I was confused by Markus Kuhn's original UTF-8b specification. I have
now
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
I see two main user-oriented use cases for the resulting Unicode
strings this PEP will produce on all systems: displaying a list of
filenames for the user to select from (an open file dialog), and
allowing a user to edit or supply a filename (a save dialog or a
rename
James Y Knight wrote:
On Apr 28, 2009, at 2:50 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
James Y Knight wrote:
Hopefully it can be assumed that your locale encoding really is a
non-overlapping superset of ASCII, as is required by POSIX...
Can you please point to the part of the POSIX spec that says that
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Furthermore, I don't believe that PEP 383 works consistently on Windows,
What makes you say that? PEP 383 will have no effect on Windows,
compared to the status quo, whatsoever.
You could argue that if Windows is actually returning UTF-16 with half
surrogates that they
Glenn Linderman wrote:
On approximately 4/28/2009 11:55 AM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of MRAB:
I've been thinking of python-escape only in terms of UTF-8, the only
encoding mentioned in the PEP. In UTF-8, bytes 0x00 to 0x7F are
decodable.
UTF-8 is only mentioned
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
OK, so why not adopt the Mono solution in CPython? It seems to produce
valid unicode strings, removing at least one issue with PEP 383. It
also means that IronPython and CPython actually would be compatible.
See my other message. The Mono solution may not be what you
One further question: should the encoder accept a string like
u'\xDCC2\xDC80'? That would encode to b'\xC2\x80', which, when decoded,
would give u'\x80'. Does the PEP only guarantee that strings decoded
from the filesystem are reversible, but not check what might be de novo
strings?
Larry Hastings wrote:
Counting the votes for http://bugs.python.org/issue5799 :
+1 from Mark Hammond (via private mail)
+1 from Paul Moore (via the tracker)
+1 from Tim Golden (in Python-ideas, though what he literally said
was I'm up for it)
+1 from Michael Foord
+1 from
Barry Scott wrote:
On 30 Apr 2009, at 05:52, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
How do get a printable unicode version of these path strings if they
contain none unicode data?
Define printable. One way would be to use a regular expression,
replacing all codes in a certain range with a question mark.
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being 'A', for example?
- A - Accepted proposal
- R - Rejected proposal
W - Withdrawn proposal
- D -
Zooko O'Whielacronx wrote:
Following-up to my own post to correct a major error:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:44 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx zoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks:
My use case (Tahoe-LAFS [1]) requires that I am *able* to read arbitrary
binary names from the filesystem and store them so
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/5/1 MRAB goo...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being 'A', for example?
- A - Accepted
Michael Foord wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2009/5/1 MRAB goo...@mrabarnett.plus.com:
I've just noticed an oddity in the key in PEP 0. Most letters are used
more than once. Wouldn't it be clearer if different letters were used
for Accepted and Active instead of them both being
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
..
leaving just 'Rejected' and 'Replaced' to be disambiguated.
'X' or 'Z' for Rejected? Looks like a perfect start for a bikeshed
discussion. :-)
Are there Unicode codepoints for smilies? I'm thinking of :-) for
'Accepted' and :-( for 'Rejected'. :-)
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Martin v. Löwis writes:
I've updated the PEP accordingly.
I have three substantive comments. First, although consequences for
Python 3 byte interfaces (ie, none) are explicitly stated, as far as
I can see this PEP could apply to Python 2 as well. I don't think
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
MRAB writes:
I don't think people shouldn't be using non-ASCII-compatible
encodings for locale encodings is a sufficient rationale for a hard
error here. I mean, of course they *should* be using UTF-8. Maybe
Python 3.1 should just go ahead and error
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
The name utf8b suggested in the PEP is not in line with the codec
design
Where is that design documented, and how exactly violates the name
the design (chapter and verse, please).
Martin, I designed the whole Python codec machinery, so even if
this
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Martin v. Löwis martin at v.loewis.de writes:
Despite there being also an error handler called surrogates.
People, perhaps we could end all the bikeshedding and call one of those handlers
surrogates-pass and the other surrogates-escape, which sounds quite faithful
to
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Wouldn't renaming the existing surrogates handler be an incompatible
change, and thus inappropriate?
No - it's new in Python 3.1.
So what do you think about Antoine's proposal?
+1
Although it looks like it would be without the '-' for consistency with
existing error
Walter Dörwald wrote:
Michael Urman wrote:
[...]
Well, there is a way to stack error handlers, although it's not pretty:
[...]
codecs.register_error(surrogates_then_replace,
surrogates_then_replace)
That mitigates my arguments significantly, although I'd rather see
Terry Reedy wrote:
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Given your explanation of what the new 'surrogates' handler does (pass
rather than reject erroneous surrogates), I think 'surrogates_pass' is
fine. Thus, I considoer that and 'surrogates_excape' the best proposal
the best so far and suggest that you
Brett Cannon wrote:
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 18:56, John Arbash Meinel
john.arbash.mei...@gmail.com mailto:john.arbash.mei...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew Bennetts wrote:
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Robert Kern robert.kern at gmail.com http://gmail.com writes:
Since one may have
Michael Foord wrote:
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
A while ago, Guido declared that all special method lookups on
new-style classes bypass __getattr__ and __getattribute__. This almost
completely consistent now, and I've been working on patching up a few
incorrect cases. I've
Robert Brewer wrote:
There's a major change in functionality in the cgi module between Python
2 and Python 3 which I've just run across: the behavior of
FieldStorage.read_multi, specifically when an HTTP app accepts a file
upload within a multipart/form-data payload.
In Python 2, each part
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
Just food for thought here, but seeing how 3.1 is going to be a real featureful
schedule despite being released shortly after 3.0, wouldn't it make sense to
tighten future release planning a little? I was thinking something like doing a
major release every 12 months
Glenn Linderman wrote:
On approximately 5/16/2009 11:58 AM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of P.J. Eby:
At 11:17 AM 5/16/2009 -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
On approximately 5/16/2009 9:55 AM, came the following characters
from the keyboard of P.J. Eby:
At 06:06 PM 5/16/2009
Alexander Shigin wrote:
В Сбт, 16/05/2009 в 23:15 +0100, MRAB пишет:
FYI, on RISC OS '/' is a valid filename character and '.' is used as
the directory separator.
I'd probably say that TAB is s reasonable character to use, even
though it's OK in POSIX; after all, should anyone really be using
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 6:55 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
1. Why ';' separation, instead of tabs as in PEP 262? Aren't semicolons a
valid character in filenames?
I am changing this into a tab. for now.
What about Antoine's idea about doing a quote() on the
I've just noticed an oddity of the re module while looking at the
sources. I'll illustrate it below:
import re
p = re.compile(foo)
help(p.match)
Help on built-in function match:
match(...)
match(string[, pos[, endpos]]) -- match object or None.
Matches zero or more characters at the
Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
Exception for setting attributes of built-in type differs between
CPython and IronPython. This is not purely theoretical, as
zope.interface tries to set Implements declaration as __implemented__
attribute of built-in type object, and excepts TypeError.
Python 2.6.1
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Jun2009 11:21, Greg Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Cameron Simpson wrote:
It seems like whenever I want to do some kind of opportunistic but
non-blocking stuff with a remote service
Do you actually do this with buffered streams?
Sure, in C, python and
Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 16Jun2009 02:18, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
My itch is that peek() _feels_ like it should be look into the buffer
but actually can block and/or change the buffer.
Can block, but not if you don't want it too. You might just want to see
what, if anything
Stefan Behnel wrote:
s...@pobox.com wrote:
Aahz On Wed, Jul 01, 2009, Brett Cannon wrote:
Anything happen while I was gone that I should be aware of that is
not covered in a PEP?
Aahz Yes.
In particular, Brett, you probably didn't hear that the King of Pop died
last week.
Terry Reedy wrote:
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
It needs to be decided where the hg repositories will live. I'd like
to propose to keep the hgwebdir instance at hg.python.org. This is an
accepted standard for many organizations, and an easy parallel to
svn.python.org. The 2.7 (trunk) repo might live
Sean Reifschneider wrote:
I'm mailing this to python-dev because I'd like feedback on the idea of
adding an re attribute to strings. I'm not sure if it's a good idea or
not yet, but I figure it's worth discussion. The module mentioned here
includes a class called restr() which allows you to
Paul Moore wrote:
2009/7/27 Eric Pruitt eric.pru...@gmail.com:
Hello,
Since there was a bit of confusion last time, I'll start by saying I am
working on the subprocess.Popen module for Google Summer of Code. One of the
features I am implementing is a class so that a running process can stand
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:21:30 am MRAB wrote:
What about stderr? You could add e if you want to read from it.
Read from stderr is just a read. Write to stderr is just a write.
The difference between reading stdout and stderr is not that you have
different modes
John Machin wrote:
Hi Matthew,
Your post in c.l.py about your re rewrite didn't mention where to report
bugs etc so I dug this address out of Google Groups ...
Environment: Python 2.6.2, Windows XP SP3, your latest (29 July) regex
from the Python bugtracker.
Problem is repeated calls of
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Mark Hammond wrote:
On 5/08/2009 7:09 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
I'm not sure how win32text will provide anything other than
performance degradation for non-Windows developers, but if there's
functionality to be had, I'm happy to mandate its use on every
platform.
I see
Nick Coghlan wrote:
P.J. Eby wrote:
At 05:59 PM 8/5/2009 -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
[Jeffrey E. McAninch, PhD]
I very often want something like a try-except conditional expression
similar
to the if-else conditional.
An example of the proposed syntax might be:
x = float(string) except
Dino Viehland wrote:
MRAB wrote:
Dino Viehland wrote:
On option 1 is this legal then?
x = float(string) except float('nan') if some_check() else float('inf') if
ValueError
Well, is this is legal?
try:
x = float(string)
except some_check():
x = float('nan
Jeff McAninch wrote:
Should be legal, right?, since syntax would be
expression except expression if exception
Dino Viehland wrote:
On option 1 is this legal then?
x = float(string) except float('nan') if some_check() else
float('inf') if ValueError
Thinking more about the syntax
James Y Knight wrote:
On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:15 AM, Rob Cliffe wrote:
So - the syntax restriction seems not only inconsistent, but
pointless; it doesn't forbid anything, but merely means we have to do
it in a slightly convoluted (unPythonesque) way. So please, Guido,
will you reconsider?
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacement string can contain escape sequences, for
example:
repr(re.sub(rx, r\n, axb))
'a\\nb'
However:
repr(re.sub(rx, r\x0A, axb))
'ax0Ab'
Yes, it doesn't recognise \xNN.
Is there a reason for
On 11/12/2011 20:27, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
wrote:
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I hadn't noticed
before.
In re.sub the replacement string can contain escape sequences, for
example:
repr(re.sub(rx, r\n,
On 11/12/2011 21:04, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:47 PM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 11/12/2011 20:27, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, MRABpyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
wrote:
I've just come across an omission in re.sub which I
(I've been having trouble with my email recently, so I missed this
thread amongst others.)
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing
On 05/06/2012 01:31, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
MRAB wrote:
I personally am no longer that bothered about whether the regex module
makes it into stdlib, but I am still be maintaining it on PyPI. If
someone else wants to integrate it I would, of course, be willing to
help out.
Are you
On 05/06/2012 03:40, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/4/2012 9:22 PM, MRAB wrote:
I'm not planning any further changes to regex. I think it already has
enough features...
Do you have any idea where regex + Python stands in regard to Unicode
TR18 support levels? http://unicode.org/reports/tr18
On 06/06/2012 02:57, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Greg Ewinggreg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
What would be so bad about giving datetime objects
a DST flag? Apps that don't care could ignore it and
get results no worse than the status quo.
This would neatly
It looks like PyPI is down. :-(
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On 14/06/2012 15:15, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 13.06.2012 23:59, schrieb sandro.tosi:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/744fb52ffdf0
changeset: 77417:744fb52ffdf0
branch: 2.7
parent: 77408:60a7b704de5c
user:Sandro Tosisandro.t...@gmail.com
date:Wed Jun 13 23:58:35
On 18/06/2012 00:55, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Guido van Rossumgu...@python.org wrote:
Would it make sense to detect and reject these in 3.3 if the 2.7 syntax is
used?
Possibly - I'm trying not to actually *change* any of the internals of
the string literal
On 22/06/2012 17:39, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 6/22/2012 6:57 AM, larry.hastings wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ace45d23628a
changeset: 77567:ace45d23628a
user:Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org
date:Fri Jun 22 03:56:29 2012 -0700
summary:
Issue #14769: test_capi now
On 22/06/2012 21:45, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 06/22/2012 01:29 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Of course. And character 32 space is also not usable and perhaps not
worth testing.
Au contraire! I grant you, it's hard to imagine how using it would be a
good idea. But strictly speaking it is *usable*.
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name regex so that it can be tried alongside re.
I'd be interested in any comments or feedback. How does it compare with
re in terms of speed
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:52 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name regex so that it can be tried alongside re
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:54 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
You should be able to replace:
import re
with:
import regex as re
and still have everything work the same, ie it's backwards compatible
with re.
That's not what I'm asking. I'm asking what
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available at:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/regex
under the name regex so that it can be tried alongside
Collin Winter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:52 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Hi all,
I re-implemented the re module, adding new features and speed
improvements. It's available
It looks like the bug tracker is down.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
I can't get http://pypi.python.org and I've double-checked using
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
The regex module calls _PyUnicode_IsWhitespace, which is mapped by
unicodeobject.h to either _PyUnicodeUCS2_IsWhitespace or
_PyUnicodeUCS4_IsWhitespace.
From Python 2.5 to Python 3.1 the library pythonXX.lib contains either
_PyUnicodeUCS2_IsWhitespace or _PyUnicodeUCS4_IsWhitespace.
However, in
On 09/12/2010 05:57, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Martin v. Löwismar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
..
However, in Python 3.2b1 the library python32.lib contains only
_PyUnicode_IsWhitespace, therefore breaking the build.
Is this change intentional? If so, why does
On 09/12/2010 23:35, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:56 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com
mailto:pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
Is this change intentional? If so, why does unicodeobject.h still do
the mapping?
In 3.2b1, unicodeobject.h doesn't map
I had a thought about locale-specific formatting.
Currently, when we want to do locale-specific formatting we use the
locale module like this:
locale.format(%d, 12345, grouping=False)
'12345'
locale.format(%d, 12345, grouping=True)
'12,345'
This makes it harder to use more than one locale at
On 18/12/2010 09:26, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Comments?
How do you implement that? In particular, how do you retrieve
information for different locales in a single program?
The locale module would be able to return a named locale dict:
loc = locale.getnamedlocale('en_UK')
or:
loc =
On 19/12/2010 00:31, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 18.12.2010 19:26, schrieb MRAB:
On 18/12/2010 09:26, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Comments?
How do you implement that? In particular, how do you retrieve
information for different locales in a single program?
The locale module would be able
On 03/03/2011 15:09, Graham Stratton wrote:
On Mar 2, 3:01 pm, Graham Strattongrahamstrat...@gmail.com wrote:
We are using marshal for serialising objects before distributing them
around the cluster, and extremely occasionally a corrupted marshal is
produced. The current workaround is to
Some of those who are relative new to regexes sometimes ask how to write
a regex which checks that a number is in a range or is a valid date.
Although this may be possible, it certainly isn't easy.
From what I've read, Perl has a way of including code in a regex, but I
don't think that's a
Someone over at StackOverflow has a problem with urlopen in Python 3.2.1:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6892573/problem-with-urlopen/6892843#6892843
This is the code:
from urllib.request import urlopen
f =
On 27/08/2011 00:08, Tom Christiansen wrote:
M.-A. Lemburgm...@egenix.com wrote
on Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:00:31 +0200:
The good part is that it's based on the re code, the FUD comes
from the fact that the new lib is 380kB larger than the old one
and that's not even counting the generated
On 16/07/2013 00:30, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
In a discussion about mypy I discovered that the Python 3 version of
the re module's Match object behaves subtly different from the Python
On 16/07/2013 01:25, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 5:10 PM, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 16/07/2013 00:30, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
In a discussion about mypy
On 17/07/2013 05:15, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Terry Reedy writes:
On 7/15/2013 10:20 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Or is this something deeper, that a group *is* a new object in
principle?
No, I just think of it as returning a string
That is exactly what the doc says
On 14/08/2013 17:17, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2013 11:55, Brett Cannon br...@python.org
mailto:br...@python.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Nick Coghlan
On 15/08/2013 13:29, R. David Murray wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:22:14 +0200, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:16:20 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/8/15 Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net:
We don't have any substantial change in
On 28/08/2013 07:29, Paul Moore wrote:
On 27 August 2013 23:17, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
Thanks for your tiresome work
I'm guessing you meant tireless here :-)
That depends. It might have been tiresome for the one doing it!
On 06/09/2013 10:54, Andrew Miller wrote:
The unicodedata module only contains data up to Unicode 5.2 (October
2009), so attempting to reference any character from a later version e.g:
unicodedata.lookup(TURKISH LIRA SIGN)
results in a KeyError.
Also, it seems to be limited to properties in
On 10/09/2013 20:08, Paul Moore wrote:
On 10 September 2013 19:31, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
I think it would be a flaw to have this detail implementation-defined.
This would be like saying that it is implementation-defined which
of A,B,C is returned from A and B and C if all
On 10/09/2013 22:46, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:44:20 -0300
Joao S. O. Bueno jsbu...@python.org.br wrote:
On 10 September 2013 18:06, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:38:26 -0300
Joao S. O. Bueno jsbu...@python.org.br wrote:
On 10 September
On 14/09/2013 01:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:45:16PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Ok, I have a better (IMO) proposal:
d = TransformDict(str.casefold, {'Foo': 1})
d.getitem('foo')
('Foo', 1)
d.getitem('bar')
Traceback (most recent call last):
On 14/09/2013 02:40, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 09/13/2013 06:25 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 14/09/2013 01:49, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Is it more common to want both the canonical key and value at the same
time, or to just want the canonical key? My gut feeling is that I'm
likely to have code like
On 14/09/2013 05:47, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 09/13/2013 08:18 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
You're missing that I'm not iterating over the entire dict, just some
subset (data) that I got from elsewhere.
Ah, okay. Between you and Antoine I am convinced that .getitem() is a good
thing. So have
On 23/09/2013 20:01, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 9/22/2013 10:44 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Glad you like it. I still do, too, but I've given up hope to convince
all core developers to stick to this style. :-(
[me] ('Return' rather than 'Returns' is the current convention.)
That's actually a
On 23/09/2013 22:19, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 Sep 2013 01:24, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
mailto:solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:51:04 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 September 2013 18:45, Antoine Pitrou
On 24/09/2013 09:06, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 24 September 2013 17:34, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:25:10 +1000
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
You are setting the bar unreasonably high for an error message that
has to convey a complex concept in as
| method ignored? It explains fairly clearly what has
| happened, and also indicates what do do about it --
| catch it in the __del__ method.
|
| Exception in __del__ caught and not propagated:
| Georg
On 24Sep2013 09:33, Glenn Linderman v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com wrote:
| [MRAB]:
| Why not just
On 28/09/2013 12:28, Kevin Ngugi wrote:
Hi, I just downloaded Python 3.3 top teach myself how to program, I am
new to programming, but the guide I am using requires me to access the
toolbar, which I cannot seem to find. How do I find it and have it
displayed on the interface? I tried v 3.1 but
On 08/10/2013 19:02, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net
mailto:solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
Following the python-dev discussion, I've written a PEP to recap the
proposal and the various arguments. It's inlined below, and
On 08/10/2013 23:21, Tim Delaney wrote:
On 9 October 2013 09:10, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
It's not actually so much the extreme waste that I'm looking to
expose, but rather the day-to-day annoyances of stuff you use
regularly that slows you
On 11/10/2013 18:39, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:43 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 06:27 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Maybe to fit in with other verb-like APIs used as context managers:
it's open() not opened().
open() predates context managers, but maybe we need a new
On 11/10/2013 19:41, Glenn Linderman wrote:
On 10/11/2013 10:19 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
On 10/11/2013 12:43 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 06:27 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Maybe to fit in with other verb-like APIs used as context managers:
it's open() not opened().
open()
On 12/10/2013 05:05, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 10/11/2013 07:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Nick Coghlan writes:
(RDM is also right that the exception still has the effect of
terminating the block early, but I view names as mnemonics rather
than necessarily 100% accurate descriptions
On 24/10/2013 15:40, Kristján Valur Jónsson wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nick Coghlan [mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24. október 2013 12:44
To: Kristján Valur Jónsson
Cc: Python Dev
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Updated PEP 454 (tracemalloc): no more metrics!
Not everything is a PC
Has anybody here heard about this, and, if so, is it anything we should
be thinking about:
How your compiler may be compromising application security
http://www.itworld.com/security/380406/how-your-compiler-may-be-compromising-application-security
___
On 20/11/2013 23:36, Christian Tismer wrote:
Hey Barry,
On 20.11.13 23:30, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Nov 20, 2013, at 09:52 PM, Christian Tismer wrote:
Many customers are forced to stick with Python 2.X because of other products,
but they require a Python 2.X version which can be compiled using
1 - 100 of 506 matches
Mail list logo
