On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
pysandbox is based on safelite.py, project written by tav one year ago (search
tav in python-dev archive, February 2009). I tested RestrictedPython, but the
approach is different (rewrite bytecode) and the
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Simon Cross
hodgestar+python...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know whether I in favour of using a single pyr folder or not
but if a single folder is used I'd definitely prefer the folder to be
called __pyr__ rather than .pyr.
Do you have any specific reason for
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin jyass...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Why the -R flag? It seems like this is a uniform improvement, so it
should be the default. Have faith in your design! ;-)
+1 for a single strategy that is used in all cases. The current
solution could be phased out
Hi,
I'm a relative outsider to core development (I'm just a Plone release
manager), but'll allow myself a couple of questions. Feel free to
ignore them, if you think they are not relevant at this point :-) I'd
note that I'm generally enthusiastic and supportive of the proposal :)
As a data point,
