[Brett C.]
Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to
see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still
not
up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh,
Nick? =)
[Nick Coghlan]
Something like
At 11:12 AM 5/31/2005 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
uncertainty of the possibility to call close() from the
destructor may have slowed that down.
If you're talking about the bit about __del__ not working when hanging off
a cycle, my apologies for creating that confusion, I misunderstood Tim's
[Guido]
uncertainty of the possibility to call close() from the
destructor may have slowed that down.
[Phillip]
If you're talking about the bit about __del__ not working when hanging off
a cycle, my apologies for creating that confusion, I misunderstood Tim's post.
No, I'm not talking about
At 12:03 PM 5/31/2005 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Yes, the generator does clear its f_back when it's suspended.
I realize this won't fix all your worries; I just want to rule out this one
*particular* form of cycle as a possibility; i.e., to show that mere
reference to a generator-iterator
If Raymond would rather defer to me, I can give it a shot in a revised
version of PEP 343,
Thanks, that would be great. The decimal conversation used up a lot of
my available cycles.
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
[Guido]
Yes, the generator does clear its f_back when it's suspended.
[Phillip]
I realize this won't fix all your worries; I just want to rule out
this one *particular* form of cycle as a possibility; i.e., to show
that mere reference to a generator-iterator in a frame does not
create a
Brett C. wrote:
Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to
see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still not
up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh,
Nick? =)
Something like that. . . still, I
Been rather quite around here lately so I just wanted to do a quick check to
see what the status is on PEPs 342 and 343. I noticed Nick's PEP is still not
up. Probably too busy with that fix for genexps in the AST branch, huh, Nick?
=)
Guido, you need something hashed out from us at this
