[Guido van Rossum]
I've made a final pass over PEP 352, mostly fixing the __str__,
__unicode__ and __repr__ methods to behave more reasonably. I'm all
for accepting it now. Does anybody see any last-minute show-stopping
problems with it?
[François]
I did not follow the thread, so maybe
I've made a final pass over PEP 352, mostly fixing the __str__,
__unicode__ and __repr__ methods to behave more reasonably. I'm all
for accepting it now. Does anybody see any last-minute show-stopping
problems with it?
As always, http://python.org/peps/pep-0352.html
--
--Guido van Rossum (home
I don't follow why the PEP deprecates catching a category of exceptions
in a different release than it deprecates raising them. Why would a
release allow catching something that cannot be raised? I must be
missing something here.
Raymond
___
On 10/28/05, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't follow why the PEP deprecates catching a category of exceptions
in a different release than it deprecates raising them. Why would a
release allow catching something that cannot be raised? I must be
missing something here.
So
On 10/28/05, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't follow why the PEP deprecates catching a category of exceptions
in a different release than it deprecates raising them. Why would a
release allow catching something that cannot be raised? I must be
missing something here.
On 10/28/05, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would a
release allow catching something that cannot be raised? I must be
missing something here.
So conforming code can catch exceptions raised by not-yet conforming
code.
That makes sense.
What was the rationale for
Brett Cannon wrote:
Interesting point, but I think that chaining should have more concrete
support ala PEP 344 or some other mechanism. I think most people
agree that exception chaining is important enough to have better
support than some implied way of a causing exception to be passed
[Nick Coghlan]
Another point in PEP 352's favour, is that it makes it far more
feasible
to
implement something like PEP 344 by providing __traceback__ and
__prev_exc__ attributes on BaseException.
The 'raise' statement could then take care of setting them
appropriately
if it
was given an
On 10/28/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brett Cannon wrote:
Interesting point, but I think that chaining should have more concrete
support ala PEP 344 or some other mechanism. I think most people
agree that exception chaining is important enough to have better
support than
On 10/29/05, Nick Coghlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another point in PEP 352's favour, is that it makes it far more feasible to
implement something like PEP 344 by providing __traceback__ and
__prev_exc__ attributes on BaseException.
Not sure if I'm fully in-context here, but watch out for
10 matches
Mail list logo
