On 7/24/2010 11:21 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:51 PM, P.J. Ebyp...@telecommunity.com wrote:
By the way, the PEP's optimized implementation could probably be done just
by making generator functions containing yield-from statements return an
object of a different type
P.J. Eby wrote:
I would like to reiterate (no pun intended) the suggestion of a special
syntactic form for the return
Allowing a return
value, but then having that value silently disappear, seems like it
would delay ... learning
If I remember correctly, all these arguments were made at
At 07:08 AM 7/24/2010 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
- After seeing Raymond's talk about monocle (search for it on PyPI) I
am getting excited again about PEP 380 (yield from, return values from
generators). Having read the PEP on the plane back home I didn't see
anything wrong with it, so it
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 6:51 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 07:08 AM 7/24/2010 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
- After seeing Raymond's talk about monocle (search for it on PyPI) I
am getting excited again about PEP 380 (yield from, return values from
generators). Having read
At 08:21 PM 7/24/2010 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
FWIW, the thing that was harder to debug when I tried to write some
code involving generators and a trampoline recently, was thinking of a
function as a generator without actually putting a yield in it
(because a particular version of a
