Re: [Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 313 -- Adding Roman Numeral Literals to Python

2005-06-18 Thread BJörn Lindqvist
*cough* Would it also be possible for the PEP-maintainers not to accept PEPs that are obvious jokes unless thedate is April I? *uncough* -- mvh Bjrn ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev

Re: [Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 313 -- Adding Roman Numeral Literals to Python

2005-06-18 Thread Martin v. Löwis
BJrn Lindqvist wrote: Would it also be possible for the PEP-maintainers not to accept PEPs that are obvious jokes unless thedate is April I? I believe this is the current policy. Why do you think the PEP editor works differently? Regards, Martin ___

[Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 313 -- Adding Roman Numeral Literals to Python

2005-06-17 Thread Raymond Hettinger
While the majority of Python users deem this to be a nice-to-have feature, the community has been unable to reach a consensus on the proper syntax after more than two years of intensive debate (the PEP was introduced in early April 2003). Most agree that there should be only-one-way-to-do-it;

Re: [Python-Dev] Propose to reject PEP 313 -- Adding Roman Numeral Literals to Python

2005-06-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
+M to reject. On 6/16/05, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While the majority of Python users deem this to be a nice-to-have feature, the community has been unable to reach a consensus on the proper syntax after more than two years of intensive debate (the PEP was introduced in