Fantastic, Petr! Thanks for letting us know - and thank you once again for
your patience with our last-minute changes! We'll go ahead and mark the PEP
as accepted, and merge our CPython implementation soon.
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 08:34, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 17. 11. 21 23:47, Barry Warsaw
Thanks, Brett. We'll notify you once we've resolved the issue.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 19:30, Brett Cannon wrote:
> I put the PEP back on our agenda to discuss this.
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 2:40 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> Hi Barry,
>>
>> That's fantastic news!
>>
>> Somewhat
Hi Barry,
Absolutely fantastic - thank you for letting us know! As Guido says,
there's one final thing that we thought would be easy to resolve but has
actually turned out to be a little tricky. Happy to proceed as you think is
best here.
Matthew
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 22:33, Guido van Rossum
I put the PEP back on our agenda to discuss this.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 2:40 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> That's fantastic news!
>
> Somewhat embarrassingly, on typing-sig we're still discussing one or two
> final tweaks. In particular, the PEP as accepted forbids a certain
>
Hi Barry,
That's fantastic news!
Somewhat embarrassingly, on typing-sig we're still discussing one or two
final tweaks. In particular, the PEP as accepted forbids a certain
construct (passing a tuple of indefinite length to a function using `*args:
*Ts`) that after all we may actually want to
