On 2/28/06, Mike Bland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized that there's a bug in the with-statement as currently
checked in. __exit__ is supposed to re-raise the exception if there
was one; if it returns normally, the finally clause
On 2/28/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Mike Bland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized that there's a bug in the with-statement as currently
checked in. __exit__ is supposed to re-raise the exception if
On 2/28/06, Mike Bland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Mike Bland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/28/06, Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized that there's a bug in the with-statement as currently
checked
Guido van Rossum wrote:
I just realized that there's a bug in the with-statement as currently
checked in. __exit__ is supposed to re-raise the exception if there
was one; if it returns normally, the finally clause is NOT to re-raise
it. The fix is relatively simple (I believe) but requires
Guido van Rossum wrote:
If you changed your mind along the way, that should probably be explained in
the PEP somewhere :)
I don't know that PEPs benefit from too much on the one hand, on the
other hand, on the third hand or and then I changed my mind, and
then I changed it back, and then I
