On 27-03-2024 15:48, Karolina Surma wrote:
One way to mitigate would be to make the proposed behavior opt-in only,
with the possibility to either build wheel with -w option (already
existing) or e.g. -p (now-proposed: reading from pyproject.toml) in case
backend doesn't have
On 27. 03. 24 23:15, Maxwell G wrote:
One way to mitigate would be to make the proposed behavior opt-in only,
with the possibility to either build wheel with -w option (already
existing) or e.g. -p (now-proposed: reading from pyproject.toml) in case
backend doesn't have
On Wed Mar 27, 2024 at 15:48 +0100, Karolina Surma wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Karolina,
Thank you for bring this to the mailing list.
> recently, we were suggested an improvement for %pyproject_buildrequires
> -r/-x.
> We could read the project's runtime dependencies (if they're not marked
> as
Hello,
recently, we were suggested an improvement for %pyproject_buildrequires
-r/-x.
We could read the project's runtime dependencies (if they're not marked
as `dynamic`) from pyproject.toml [project] table directly, without
calling prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel or building the wheel to
