On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 12:21, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
> My guess is that a first test of an email address might be to see if a decent
> module of that kind fills out the object to your satisfaction. You can then
> perhaps test parts of the object, rather than everything at once, to see
I have never had a need to check email but in my reading over the years, I am
aware of modules of multiple kinds you can use to do things like parsing dates,
URL and email addresses and probably many other such things into some kind of
object and then you can use aspects of the object to do
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 07:17, Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-02, Simon Connah wrote:
> > Valid as in conforms to the standard. Although having looked at the
> > standard that might be more difficult than originally planned.
>
> Yes. Almost nobody actually implements "the
If i wanted an email verifier I would look at open source frameworks and see
how they do it. Django comes to mind.--(Unsigned mail from my phone)
Original message From: Michael Torrie via Python-list
Date: 3/11/23 07:23 (GMT+10:00) To:
python-list@python.org Subject: Re:
On 11/2/23 04:58, Chris Green via Python-list wrote:
I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable
On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2023-11-02, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> > Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
>> >> ...
>> >>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
>> >>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
>> >
>> >
On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
>> > I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
>> > python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
>> > finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
>> >
>> >
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> > I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
> > python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
> > finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
> >
> > So they now have only python3 and there is
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-11-02, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
> >> ...
> >>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
> >>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
> >
> > `pip list -o` will tell you for which packages
On 11/2/23 00:42, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
> Basically I'm writing unit tests and one of them passess in a string
> with an invalid email address. I need to be able to check the string
> to see if it is a valid email so that the unit test passess.
If you truly have managed to code an
On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
> python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
> finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
>
> So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
> PATH.
On 2023-11-02, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
>> ...
>>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
>>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
>
> `pip list -o` will tell you for which packages there are upgrades
> available.
>
On 2023-11-02, Simon Connah wrote:
> Valid as in conforms to the standard. Although having looked at the
> standard that might be more difficult than originally planned.
Yes. Almost nobody actually implements "the standard" as in RFC 2822
section 3.4.1 (which can contain, for example,
On 2023-11-02 00:18, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message sort
of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
some status being sent back such as DELIVERABLE or NO SUCH USER or even
MAILBOX FULL.
It
Hello,
I would like to develop Mobile Applications using the Kivy Python Framework
but I am having difficulty and these are the errors I am finding "
C:\WINDOWS\system32>python3 --version Python was not found; run without
arguments to install from the Microsoft Store, or disable this shortcut
Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
> ...
>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
`pip list -o` will tell you for which packages there are upgrades
available.
`pip install -U ...` will upgrade packages.
Be
Yes, Chris, many things can be used for lesser purposes.
Perhaps this could be like when people automate guessing passwords and one
defense is to stop accepting after N bad guesses till some external method
resets things.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico
> Please re-read.
> Discussion is about "closeness".
> Thus, what you might expect from email servers and Admins, NOT what you
> should do. That part should be quite evident by now!
>
My apologies for making a mistake.
Simon.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
On 2023-11-02 02:04, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message sort
of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
some status being
I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
PATH.
There's still both /usr/bin/pip and
On 2023-11-02, dn wrote:
> On 02/11/2023 19.46, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>> [...]
>> My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could
>> just send email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it
>> from the database. Thing is I'm not sure how close to a real
Chris Angelico writes:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test
> message sort of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient
> but merely results in some status being sent back such as
On 2023-11-02, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> On 2023-11-01 17:17, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Grant Edwards via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>> Make sure it has an '@' in it. Possibly require at least one '.'
>>> after the '@'.
>>
>> No guarantee that there'll be a
On 02/11/2023 20.28, Simon Connah wrote:
I'm not sure that would be practical. As I'm setting up a mailing list server I
don't know if someone in the future is going to need to use one of those
aliases and testing manually would be tedious.
Please re-read.
Discussion is about "closeness".
> Agreed.
>
> However, with names that are frequently misspelled or which are
> commonly-spelled slightly differently, the 'trick' is to anticipate
> problems and set up aliases which forward messages to the correct address*.
>
> eg Kelvin -> Kevlin
>
> Niel, Neal, Neale (etc) -> Neil
>
>
Thursday, November 02, 2023 at 6:46, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
Re: Checking if email is valid (at least in part)
>My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could just send
>email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it from the database.
That function
On 02/11/2023 19.56, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:47, Simon Connah wrote:
My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could just send
email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it from the database.
Thing is I'm not sure how
>
>
> See https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9585?page=0,0
>
That looks painful to maintain!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 02/11/2023 19.46, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
python-list@python.org wrote:
Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to find out if
a string is a valid email address.
There is only one way
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:47, Cameron Simpson via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 02Nov2023 17:04, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test
> >> message sort
> >> of like an ACK that is
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:47, Simon Connah wrote:
>
> My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could just send
> email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it from the database.
> Thing is I'm not sure how close to a real email address an email has to be in
>
>
> On 2023-11-01, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
> > python-list@python.org wrote:
> >
> > > Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to
> > > find out if a string is a valid email address.
> >
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
> python-list@python.org wrote:
>
> > Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to find
> > out if a string is a valid email address.
>
>
> There is only one way to know that a string is a valid email
On 02Nov2023 17:04, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test
message sort
of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
some status being sent back such as
>
> On 2023-11-01, Simon Connah via Python-list python-list@python.org wrote:
>
> > I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a
> > question. I've been doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check
> > if an email message is valid.
>
>
> Send an e-mail using it? If the right
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message sort
> of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
> some status being sent back such as DELIVERABLE or NO SUCH USER or even
>
36 matches
Mail list logo
