Op 28/03/2024 om 17:45 schreef ast via Python-list:
Hello
Suppose I have these 3 strings:
s1 = "AZERTY"
s2 = "QSDFGH"
s3 = "WXCVBN"
and I need an itertor who delivers
A Q W Z S C E D C ...
I didn't found anything in itertools to do the job.
The documentation mentions a roundrobin
modified/extended BNF description of a superset of the intended language
and used other means to further check whether the code in question was
valid or not. -- Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
ouldn't be the following.
queries:list[dict[str,str]|dict[str,list]|dict[str,dict[str, dict[str, Ant]]]
My impression at this moment is that you are write something like: dict[str,
str | int] as
as shorthand for dict[str, str] | dict[str, int]. But those two are different
types.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 23/12/2023 om 12:34 schreef Barry Scott:
On 23 Dec 2023, at 09:48, Antoon Pardon via Python-list
wrote:
Because I have functions with DirEntry parameters.
I would duck-type a class I control to be my DirEnrry in this situation.
Would also help you when debugging as you can tell
Op 22/12/2023 om 21:39 schreef DL Neil via Python-list:
Antoon,
On 12/23/23 01:00, Antoon Pardon via Python-list wrote:
I am writing a program that goes through file hierarchies and I am
mostly
using scandir for that which produces DirEntry instances.
At times it would be usefull if I could
r, is_file, ... methods.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have the following small module:
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 8< =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
from typing import NamedTuple, TypeAlias, Union
from collections.abc import Sequence
PNT: TypeAlias = tuple[float, float]
class Pnt (NamedTuple):
x: float
y: float
def __add__(self, other:
Op 23/01/2023 om 17:24 schreef Johannes Bauer:
Hi there,
is there an easy way to evaluate a string stored in a variable as if
it were an f-string at runtime?
I.e., what I want is to be able to do this:
x = { "y": "z" }
print(f"-> {x['y']}")
This prints "-> z", as expected. But consider:
x
Op 27/12/2022 om 16:49 schreef Thomas Passin:
On 12/27/2022 8:25 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 27/12/2022 om 13:46 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 23:28, Antoon Pardon
wrote:
At the moment I am happy with a solution that once the programmer has
imported from QYZlib.threaders
Op 27/12/2022 om 13:46 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 23:28, Antoon Pardon wrote:
At the moment I am happy with a solution that once the programmer has
imported from QYZlib.threaders that module will used as the threading
module.
Oh! If that's all you need, then yes
Op 27/12/2022 om 13:09 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 23:06, Antoon Pardon wrote:
How do you intend to distinguish one from the other? How should the
logging module know which threading module to use?
That is my question! How can I get the logging module to use my module.I
Op 27/12/2022 om 12:28 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 22:13, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 27/12/2022 om 11:37 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 21:29, Antoon Pardon wrote:
OK, I am writing an alternative for the threading module. What I would
like to know is how
Op 27/12/2022 om 11:37 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022 at 21:29, Antoon Pardon wrote:
OK, I am writing an alternative for the threading module. What I would
like to know is how I can get some library modules call my alternative
instead of the threading module.
For instance
the logging module to call the
function from my module to get the current_thread, instead of it calling
"current_thread" from the threading module.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
t could possibly go wrong?
Nothing that can't go wrong otherwise. It is my experience that
when a [Return] is needed, people just type in a two key combination.
They don't type one key, then check, then type [Return].
So in practice the same things go wrong, either way.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You can use the following decorator for what you probably want.
def copy_defaults(func):
"""
This decorator makes that defaults values are copied on a call.
"""
signature = inspect.signature(func)
parameter_items = list(signature.parameters.items())
@wraps(func)
def
made it clear you wanted a fight. I choose not to enter that
fight.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 16/10/2022 om 19:01 schreef Peter J. Holzer:
On 2022-10-16 12:17:39 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16/10/2022 om 00:50 schreefavi.e.gr...@gmail.com:
That might not easily solve this problem. But I wonder if reserving
some kind of prefix might help, so anything like extension.0nNoBreak
to and from a
long list of reserved key words that may vary by locale?
I think you are carrying my idea further than I intended. I was just
thinking that instead of using U+0064 U+0065 U+0066 [beinf def] we could
be using U+1D41D U+1D41E U+1D41F [being 퐝퐞퐟].
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https
Op 16/10/2022 om 19:03 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 03:57, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 16/10/2022 om 17:05 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 22:47, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Why would I need good luck? I expressed an idea and you didn't like it.
That won't affect
Op 16/10/2022 om 17:05 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 22:47, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Why would I need good luck? I expressed an idea and you didn't like it.
That won't affect my life in a meaningful way.
Well, with that attitude, it's not going to affect anyone else's life
Op 16/10/2022 om 13:03 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 at 21:19, Antoon Pardon wrote:
My idea would be to reserve different unicode blocks for the keywords
and the identifiers. e.g. We could reserve the mathematical alphanumeric
block for keywords and all other letters
a
strugle searching for a keyword that will break as little programs as
possible.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
d directly in a cron script but not via a python
script, you may need to export the PATH in your cron script.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
,7],[8,9]]
>>> list(itertools.chain.from_iterable(lst))
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
in python with the same kind of syntax:
https://code.activestate.com/recipes/580625-collection-pipeline-in-python/
I have my own python3 module with stuff like that and I find it very usefull.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 10/10/2022 om 19:08 schreef Robert Latest via Python-list:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
I would like a tool that tries to find as many syntax errors as possible
in a python file.
I'm puzzled as to when such a tool would be needed. How many syntax errors can
you realistically put into a single
Op 10/10/2022 om 00:45 schreef Cameron Simpson:
On 09Oct2022 21:46, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Is it that onerous to fix one thing and run it again? It was once
when you
handed in punch cards and waited a day or on very busy machines.
Yes I find it onerous, especially since I have a pipeline
of such a tool doesn't need to go through all the provided
information.
If after correcting a few errors, the users find the rest of the information
gives
him a headache, he can just ignore all that and just run a new iteration.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 9/10/2022 om 21:18 schreef Avi Gross:
Antoon, it may also relate to an interpreter versus compiler issue.
Something like a compiler for C does not do anything except write code in
an assembly language. It can choose to keep going after an error and start
looking some more from a less
Op 9/10/2022 om 21:18 schreef Avi Gross:
Antoon, it may also relate to an interpreter versus compiler issue.
Something like a compiler for C does not do anything except write code in
an assembly language. It can choose to keep going after an error and start
looking some more from a less
Op 9/10/2022 om 19:23 schreef Karsten Hilbert:
Am Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 06:59:36PM +0200 schrieb Antoon Pardon:
Op 9/10/2022 om 17:49 schreef Avi Gross:
My guess is that finding 100 errors might turn out to be misleading. If you
fix just the first, many others would go away.
At this moment
Op 9/10/2022 om 17:49 schreef Avi Gross:
My guess is that finding 100 errors might turn out to be misleading. If you
fix just the first, many others would go away.
At this moment I would prefer a tool that reported 100 errors, which would
allow me to easily correct 10 real errors, over the
. I just want a tool for syntax errors. No style
enforcements. Any recommandations? -- Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 31/08/2022 om 09:53 schreef dn:
On 31/08/2022 19.38, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 30/08/2022 om 23:52 schreef dn:
The conversation seems to be wandering some way from the OP. Whereas
both of these answers are clever (and I assume work), the question
becomes: why would you want to do
the module that did the import will not notice the change
in the original module.
focussing on the code smell, is leading the attention away from the problem.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 16/08/2022 om 00:20 schreef dn:
On 16/08/2022 00.56, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 5/08/2022 om 07:50 schreef Loris Bennett:
Antoon Pardon writes:
Op 4/08/2022 om 13:51 schreef Loris Bennett:
Hi,
I am constructing a list of dictionaries via the following list
comprehension:
data
Op 5/08/2022 om 07:50 schreef Loris Bennett:
Antoon Pardon writes:
Op 4/08/2022 om 13:51 schreef Loris Bennett:
Hi,
I am constructing a list of dictionaries via the following list
comprehension:
data = [get_job_efficiency_dict(job_id) for job_id in job_ids]
However
?
In that case your list will be all dictionaries and empty ones will be processed
fast enough.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 25/07/2022 om 16:43 schreef Dennis Lee Bieber:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:39:46 +0200, Antoon Pardon
declaimed the following:
Yes it is, but it doesn't answer my question: How do I create a package
in which a file is built at install time.
I just want to build a configuration file
Op 19/07/2022 om 16:57 schreef David Lowry-Duda:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:58:41PM +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
I am writing a python package which has the following structure
PACKAGE
* module1.py
* module2.py
* data.cfg
However the data.cfg should be build at installation time
should be build with the following linix command:
$ date '+installed on %Y:%M:%d at %T' > data.cfg
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Or you could try this as an alternative:
conds = [ (lambda code: lambda msg: msg.hascode(code))(z) for z in
("foo", "bar") ]
Op 29/06/2022 om 12:43 schreef Johannes Bauer:
Aha!
conds = [ lambda msg, z = z: msg.hascode(z) for z in ("foo", "bar") ]
Is what I was looking for to explicitly
and the visually-challenged!)
ell = l
one = 1
min(enumerate(ell), key=lambda x: x[one])
I'd like to point to the operator module which allows you to write the
above as:
min(enumerate(ell), key=operator.itemgetter(one))
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
to text
2) Split into lines
3) Iterate backwards over the lines
Tada! Done. And in Python, quite easy. The downside, of course, is
that you have to store the entire file in memory.
Why not just do:
tail = collections.deque(text_stream, maxlen = nr_of_lines)
tail.reverse()
...
--
Antoon Pardon
Op 16/04/2022 om 23:36 schreef Sam Ezeh:
Two questions here.
Firstly, does anybody know of existing discussions (e.g. on here or on
python-ideas) relating to unpacking inside lambda expressions?
I found myself wanting to write the following.
```
map(
lambda (module, data):
Op 11/04/2022 om 02:31 schreef Dan Stromberg:
It sounds a little like you're looking for interval arithmetic.
Maybe https://pypi.org/project/python-intervals/1.5.3/ ?
Not completely but it suggested an idea to explore.
--
Antoon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 11/04/2022 om 02:01 schreef duncan smith:
On 10/04/2022 21:20, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 9/04/2022 om 02:01 schreef duncan smith:
On 08/04/2022 22:08, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Well my first thought is that a bitset makes it less obvious to
calulate
the size of the set or to iterate over
Op 9/04/2022 om 02:01 schreef duncan smith:
On 08/04/2022 22:08, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Well my first thought is that a bitset makes it less obvious to calulate
the size of the set or to iterate over its elements. But it is an idea
worth exploring.
def popcount(n):
""&qu
Op 8/04/2022 om 16:28 schreef duncan smith:
On 08/04/2022 08:21, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Yes I know all that. That is why I keep a bucket of possible duplicates
per "identifying" field that is examined and use some heuristics at the
end of all the comparing instead of starting t
Op 8/04/2022 om 08:24 schreef Peter J. Holzer:
On 2022-04-07 17:16:41 +0200, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 7/04/2022 om 16:08 schreef Joel Goldstick:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:19 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
I am working with a list of data from which I have to weed out duplicates.
At the moment I
Op 7/04/2022 om 16:08 schreef Joel Goldstick:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 7:19 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
I am working with a list of data from which I have to weed out duplicates.
At the moment I keep for each entry a container with the other entries
that are still possible duplicates.
The problem
.
So what would be a relatively easy way to get the same result without wasting
too much memory on entries that haven't any weeding done on them.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
functions.
Maybe if you contact them they can be interested in making a similar decorating
macro
for use with such recursive decorators.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 4/03/2022 om 02:08 schreef Avi Gross via Python-list:
If Python was being designed TODAY, I wonder if a larger set of key words would
be marked as RESERVED for future expansion including ORELSE and even
NEVERTHELESS.
I think a better solution would be to have reserved words written
Op 2/03/2022 om 15:58 schreef Larry Martell:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:37 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
If one list is empty I want just the other list. What I am doing is
building a list to pass to a mongodb query. If region is empty then I
want to query for just the items in the os list. I
Op 2/03/2022 om 15:29 schreef Larry Martell:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 9:10 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2/03/2022 om 14:44 schreef Larry Martell:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:37 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2/03/2022 om 14:27 schreef Larry Martell:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:21 PM<2qdxy4rzwz
Op 2/03/2022 om 14:44 schreef Larry Martell:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 8:37 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 2/03/2022 om 14:27 schreef Larry Martell:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 7:21 PM<2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
On 2022-03-01 at 19:12:10 -0500,
Larry Martell wrote:
If I
t seems to be an empty list,
which IMO is a perfectly valid result.
All possible permutations over two collections where one collection is
empty, should IMO give you an empty collection.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 22/02/2022 om 09:40 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 19:33, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
wrote:
As discussed here but, it would have been nevertheless great to have this
tiny function instead of
nothing
Here's a function that determines whether or not you have an internet
You could try miniconda.
Op 17/01/2022 om 20:53 schreef Sina Mobasheri:
Consider scenario that I want run python 3.10 in CentOS 8, I think last python
version in CentOS repository is 3.6, if I use epel I can get 3.8 so ..., I
think (correct me if I'm wrong ) the only way that I can run
() - a.keys()
{3}
Why not frozenset({3})?
My 2 cents worths: Because dictviews mutate with the directory. That makes
them more like set than like frozenset. So operations on them produce a set.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e original iterator
with an extra termination condition. So in order to start the next
group-iterator the previous
group-iterator is exhausted, because the original iterator has to be
ready to produce values
for the next group-iterator.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listi
ing a reverse_view function, that takes a list
as argument and produces something that behaves as the reversed list
without actually reversing the list and then as in the first option
use the [y:] slice on that.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Did I get that right?
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
are
not as issue. I then explain you
misunderdood en now you come with the above.
Maybe you should be more aware of the history of a thread before coming with
this kind of statements.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
e test which you use to control this
loop.
Should I think it worth the trouble to rewrite your example, quod non,
it would be like below, with that unneeded list.
while [
play_game(),
input("Play again? ") in ['y', 'Y', 'yes', 'Yes']][-1]:
pass
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
h
Op 27/10/2021 om 20:20 schreef Avi Gross:
I think anyone who suggests we should separate costs from benefits belongs
securely within the academic world and should remain there.
Practical things need to be built considering costs. Theoretical things,
sure, cost is not an issue.
Seperating
Op 27/10/2021 om 18:16 schreef Christman, Roger Graydon:
On 27/10/2021 at 12:45 Antoon Pardon wrote:
However with the introduction of the walrus operator there is a
way to simulate a significant number of one and a half loops.
Consider the following:
>do
> a =
a whole let useful.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 27/10/2021 om 10:49 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 7:46 PM Antoon Pardon wrote:
So if you want this added, show a use-case that makes it look way
better than the alternatives (including a generator, a mid-loop break,
etc).
Way better according to which criteria? IMO
should
combine those two work variables into some kind of instance no matter
how contrived.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 27/10/2021 om 10:05 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:00 PM Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26/10/2021 om 00:24 schreef Chris Angelico:
TBH, I don't think there's a lot of value in multiple-assignment,
since it has a number of annoying conflicts of syntax and few viable
use
Op 27/10/2021 om 10:05 schreef Chris Angelico:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 6:00 PM Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 26/10/2021 om 00:24 schreef Chris Angelico:
TBH, I don't think there's a lot of value in multiple-assignment,
since it has a number of annoying conflicts of syntax and few viable
use
Is that one use case or is that a use case for each kind of couple?
And even if the benefits are little per case, they can add up with every
occasion such a case pops up.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
an assignment.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 25/10/2021 om 18:47 schreef Christman, Roger Graydon:
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:20:52 +0200
From: Antoon Pardon
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: New assignmens ...
Message-ID: <5761dd65-4e87-8b8c-1400-edb821204...@vub.be>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8;
Op 25/10/2021 om 23:03 schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 7:18 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Op 25/10/2021 om 20:39 schreef Chris Angelico:
>>> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:35 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
>>>> By putting limits on the walrus code, you ar
Op 25/10/2021 om 20:39 schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 5:35 AM Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> By putting limits on the walrus code, you are not reducing complexity, you
>> are increasing it.
>> You are increasing complexity because you can't just reuse the
tting limits on the walrus code, you are not reducing complexity, you are
increasing it.
You are increasing complexity because you can't just reuse the code that
handles an ordinary
assignment. You now need specific code to limit it's use.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
the second code over
the first.
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have a file with python code but the name doesn't end with the '.py'
suffix.
What is the easiest way to import this code as a module without changing
its name?
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Have I missed something and has the maillinglist been moved. Activity is
very low here, about one message every five days.
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
languages.
Can that be done with f-strings?
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 24/02/21 om 17:12 schreef Ethan Furman:
I'm looking for a name for a group of options that, when one is
specified, all of them must be specified.
It seems you are looking at an equivalence.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I need to do some development on this legacy system. It only runs
python2.6 and there is little hope of installing an other version. How
can I best proceed to install modules for working with mysql and ldap?
--
Antoon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Most of us know of the perils of mutable default values. So I came up with the
following proof of concept:
from inspect import signature as signature_of, Parameter
from itertools import zip_longest
from copy import copy
def copy_defaults(f):
signature = signature_of(f)
def
Op 2/02/21 om 01:54 schreef Skip Montanaro:
Here's the crux of the problem. Where does responsibility generally
fall for low level exception handling? I don't mean to pick on
IMAPClient. It's just a recent example and got me thinking about the
problem. Is it (generally) the responsibility of the
Op 27/01/21 om 05:17 schreef Dan Stromberg:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:13 PM Dan Stromberg wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:01 PM C W wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm a long time Matlab and R user working on data science. How do you
troubleshooting/debugging in Python?
I frequently read
nd not change how the '
is treated.
What python does here is a combination of both. The \ appears and it
changes how the ' is treated. That is IMO broken.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
chain
--
Antoon Pardon
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
pip. Note that the above example pulls a
particular tagged release via the "@5.0.3" suffix.
That is a nice feature. I will have a closer look at this.
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 15/08/20 om 15:02 schreef Chris Angelico:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 10:45 PM Antoon Pardon
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't understand this argument. The trace back information that is
>> destroyed with this optimization, is information that isn't available
&
at is at heart a state machine would be a lot more
easy if python would have TCO. Then each state could be implemented by
a function and transitioning from one state to the next would be just
calling the next function.
Sure you can resolve this by writing your state function trampoline styl
Op 15/08/20 om 07:33 schreef dn via Python-list:
> On 14/08/2020 22:32, Antoon Pardon wrote:
>> Well the question is in the subject.
>>
>> I have a number of modules/packages which were until recently
>> personal use only. However python is getting more popular
>
Well the question is in the subject.
I have a number of modules/packages which were until recently
personal use only. However python is getting more popular
at work and some of my work was considered useful enough to
install in a public available spot.
How should I approach this?
--
Antoon.
--
that is not
present, should raise KeyError.
Is that somehow possible?
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 15/05/20 om 00:36 schreef Stephane Tougard:
Hello,
A multithreaded software written in Python is connected with a Postgres
database. To avoid concurrent access issue with the database, it starts
a thread who receive all SQL request via queue.put and queue.get (it
makes only insert, so
depth += inc
return parseStack
parseStack = make_parseStack()
--
Antoon Pardon.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Op 9/04/20 om 18:37 schreef Peter Otten:
Antoon Pardon wrote:
I am experimenting with subclasses that all need the same metaclass as the
base class. Is there a way to make the metaclass be inherited, so that you
don't have to repeat the "metaclass = MetaClass" with ever
1 - 100 of 1793 matches
Mail list logo
