Well, its kind of obvious to make a skeleton, copy it in for some basic
functionality and modularly ( is that a word ? ) manage each piece.
That ( like your example ) is fine stuff.
As a side note, I am sure large, large highly generalised programs are pretty
hard to make.
One thing I do is
I am not specifically having any problems implementing what I want to make work.
Callbacks etc make it fairly easy to make TKinter react to things without any
specific fancy plan for it.
Add callbacks for real time changes early in any new notion, after it looks
right go to the IO part make
If you have a problem,. ask a super specific question, here. If I can help, I
will, but TKINTER knowledge is pretty spread around. Many others migth jump in,
too.
Its works, its slightly quirky, has no licencing hangups.
X11 makes fine fine programs !
Keep hacking,Dan
--
Hi,
I've write a huge biotech program ( an IDE for synthetic biology ), and am
slowly outgrowing TKINTER.
Has anybody out there merged a little bit of TCL direct calls from Python 3.X
to get more freedom then TKINTER for just some Windows ?
How about bold stories of successes ( yours, not
Why do we tolerate this spam ?
this seems most likely a way to inject viruses into people's workflow.
That wiped out usenet. Ahh without an explaination; ( and it woudl have to be a
good one ); what is the purpsoe of this, why is it here ?
Can it be eliminated ?
Regards,
Dan
--
