Re: GIL-Removal Project Takes Another Step (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)

2024-03-20 Thread Chris Angelico via Python-list
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 18:31, Greg Ewing via Python-list wrote: > > On 20/03/24 4:14 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > > not to > > mention the latency when there isn’t quite enough memory for an allocation > > and you have to wait until the next GC run to proceed. Run the GC a > > thousand times

Re: GIL-Removal Project Takes Another Step (Posting On Python-List Prohibited)

2024-03-20 Thread Greg Ewing via Python-list
On 20/03/24 4:14 pm, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: not to mention the latency when there isn’t quite enough memory for an allocation and you have to wait until the next GC run to proceed. Run the GC a thousand times a second, and the latency is still 1 millisecond. That's not the way it usually