Mirko wrote:
> On 22.12.2020 at 20:24 Chris Green wrote:
>
> > Yes, I do have the Python source. The only thing I don't have the
> > source for is a .so file and that's why I can't simply migrate the
> > program(s) from Python 2 to Python 3.
> >
>
> If it's just one .so and that library is
On 22.12.2020 at 20:24 Chris Green wrote:
> Yes, I do have the Python source. The only thing I don't have the
> source for is a .so file and that's why I can't simply migrate the
> program(s) from Python 2 to Python 3.
>
If it's just one .so and that library is compatible with basic libs
such
On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>
>> I should have mentioned that bundlers like cx_freeze require that you
>> have the Python source for the main app. I don't remember if you
>> mentioned source or not...
>
> Yes, I do have the Python source. The only thing I don't have
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> > How realistic/possible would it be to run the utility in a separate
> >> > environment with its own copies of Python2 and any modules and
> >> >
On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > How realistic/possible would it be to run the utility in a separate
>> > environment with its own copies of Python2 and any modules and
>> > libraries needed? I would install
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > How realistic/possible would it be to run the utility in a separate
> > environment with its own copies of Python2 and any modules and
> > libraries needed? I would install these 'by hand', i.e. not using
> > 'apt' so
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 2:21 AM Chris Green wrote:
>
> I have (as discussed here) a printer utility that uses Python 2 and I
> can't update it to Python 3 because it has a .so library file which is
> compiled for Python 2. I think I have exhausted all the possibilities
> for converting it to
On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> [...]
>
> How realistic/possible would it be to run the utility in a separate
> environment with its own copies of Python2 and any modules and
> libraries needed? I would install these 'by hand', i.e. not using
> 'apt' so they would stay as installed even as
On 12/22/20 9:44 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> I have it running on 20.04 (with a couple of compatibility packages
> from a PPA) but I know I start hitting problems as soon as I move to
> 20.10. So that does sound like an excellent idea. Where can I find
> information about building container type
Michael Torrie wrote:
> On 12/22/20 8:10 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> > I have (as discussed here) a printer utility that uses Python 2 and I
> > can't update it to Python 3 because it has a .so library file which is
> > compiled for Python 2. I think I have exhausted all the possibilities
> > for
On 2020-12-22, Chris Green wrote:
> I have (as discussed here) a printer utility that uses Python 2 and I
> can't update it to Python 3 because it has a .so library file which is
> compiled for Python 2. I think I have exhausted all the possibilities
> for converting it to Python 3 so now I'm
On 12/22/20 8:10 AM, Chris Green wrote:
> I have (as discussed here) a printer utility that uses Python 2 and I
> can't update it to Python 3 because it has a .so library file which is
> compiled for Python 2. I think I have exhausted all the possibilities
> for converting it to Python 3 so now
I have (as discussed here) a printer utility that uses Python 2 and I
can't update it to Python 3 because it has a .so library file which is
compiled for Python 2. I think I have exhausted all the possibilities
for converting it to Python 3 so now I'm looking at how to keep it
working on my
13 matches
Mail list logo