Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid writes:
If it's 2D data, you don't need to use a 3D graph.
if it's tabular data, you don't need an uber-histogram
--
giampippetto, coso, come si chiama? ah si` MMAX ha scritto:
Tra il trascendente e l'interpretazione prevalente del dato come
assioma ne
AlienBaby matt.j.war...@gmail.com writes:
I'd be grateful for any suggestions / pointers to something useful,
Ignoring the commercial vs. open source discussion, although it was a
few years ago, I found Chart Director (http://www.advsofteng.com/) to
work very well, with plenty of platform and
Hi,
I'm on the hunt for a good quality commercially licensed graphing /
plotting library and wondered if anyone here had any recomendations.
The work to be done is less scientific, more presentational, (I'm not
going to be dealing with heatmaps / vectors etc.., just the usual
bar / line / bubble
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like GNU
Plot.
2010/4/6 AlienBaby matt.j.war...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'm on the hunt for a good quality commercially licensed graphing /
plotting library and wondered if anyone here had any recomendations.
The work to be done is
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it because I don't care if it's ugly but it
clearly lacks of look feel for presentations, as requested by the OP.
You have
On Apr 6, 4:24 pm, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it because I don't care if it's ugly but it
clearly lacks of look feel for
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it because I don't care if it's ugly but it
clearly lacks of look feel for
--- On Tue, 4/6/10, AlienBaby matt.j.war...@gmail.com wrote:
From: AlienBaby matt.j.war...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Recommend Commercial graphing library
To: python-list@python.org
Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2010, 12:05 PM
On Apr 6, 4:24 pm, Jean-Michel
Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote
On Apr 6, 11:05 am, AlienBaby matt.j.war...@gmail.com wrote:
The requirement for a commercial license comes down to being
restricted to not using any open source code. If it's an open source
license it can't be used in our context.
You may be misunderstanding this issue, I think you are
On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it because I don't care if
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:05 AM, AlienBaby matt.j.war...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 6, 4:24 pm, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com
wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it because
On 04/06/2010 10:05 AM, AlienBaby wrote:
The requirement for a commercial license comes down to being
restricted to not using any open source code. If it's an open source
license it can't be used in our context.
Python itself and all its standard libraries are open source, under the
PSF
Grant Edwards ha scritto:
On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is ugly. I'm using it
Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Seriously, most of the graphs I've seen in presentations would make
Ed Tufte spin in his grave.
http://flowingdata.com/2010/03/20/powerpoint-and-dying-kittens/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I am just looking at the PSF license now as it goes. It does appear
that we should be able to continue using matplotlib. - the
restrictions on open-source that have been imposed specifically state
it is fine to use the python language, and if matplotlib has the same
license I personally can't see
On 2010-04-06 11:44 AM, superpollo wrote:
Grant Edwards ha scritto:
On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives?
Like
On 2010-04-06, superpollo ute...@esempio.net wrote:
Grant Edwards ha scritto:
On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free
On 2010-04-06, Duncan Booth duncan.bo...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
Seriously, most of the graphs I've seen in presentations would make
Ed Tufte spin in his grave.
http://flowingdata.com/2010/03/20/powerpoint-and-dying-kittens/
:)
Years ago I was
On 04/07/10 02:22, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and free alternatives? Like
GNU Plot.
Gnuplot is
On 2010-04-07, Lie Ryan lie.1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/07/10 02:22, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Grant Edwards inva...@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2010-04-06, Jean-Michel Pichavant jeanmic...@sequans.com wrote:
Pablo Recio Quijano wrote:
Why must be commercial, when there is open and
20 matches
Mail list logo
