On 12/29/23 05:02, Left Right via Python-list wrote:
Wow. That place turned out to be the toxic pit I didn't expect.
It's a shame that a public discussion of public goods was entrusted to
a bunch of gatekeepers with no sense of responsibility for the thing
they keep the keys to.
Personal
This thread is no longer being useful, and is now closed.
--
~Ethan~
Moderator
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> others do not and so your notion of what is "accepted"
> is not universally shared.
Why should I or anyone else care about what "others" think? The
important question is whether what I do is right. And the answer is
"yes". That's why there are rules in the first place instead of
polling.
> if
On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 at 00:35, Left Right wrote:
>
> It's not for you to choose the way I communicate. There are accepted
> boundaries, and I'm well within those boundaries. Anything beyond that
> is not something I'm even interested in hearing your opinion on.
You might not be interested in my
> You are conflating several different groups of people. The PyPA are
> the people who currently maintain the code for various
> libraries/tools. That is very often not the same as the people who
> originally wrote the code for the same libraries/tools or for
> preceding ones. Neither group is the
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 at 22:38, Left Right via Python-list
wrote:
>
> > Then your understanding is flat-out wrong. Encouraging participation
> > by everyone DOES mean deleting what is unproductive, offensive, and
> > likely to discourage participation.
>
> I haven't written anything unproductive or
> Then your understanding is flat-out wrong. Encouraging participation
> by everyone DOES mean deleting what is unproductive, offensive, and
> likely to discourage participation.
I haven't written anything unproductive or offensive. I offered
constructive criticism with a detailed plan on how to
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 06:58, Left Right wrote:
> My understanding is that "welcome and encourage participation by
> everyone" is in stark contradiction to banning someone disagreeing
> with you.
Then your understanding is flat-out wrong. Encouraging participation
by everyone DOES mean deleting
Previously you wrote:
> Here is the discussion referred to:
https://discuss.python.org/t/what-is-install-paths-to-in-wheel-file/42005
This illustrates you had no idea what the discussion was about and now
you write:
> Oh trust me, I saw the discussion previously.
Both cannot b
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 01:37, Left Right wrote:
>
> > Yeah, because you have the God-given RIGHT to be able to say anything
> > you like, on anyone's web site, and nobody's allowed to delete
> > anything you say! That's how it goes, right?
>
> I don't believe in god, and I don't believe he / she
> Yeah, because you have the God-given RIGHT to be able to say anything
> you like, on anyone's web site, and nobody's allowed to delete
> anything you say! That's how it goes, right?
I don't believe in god, and I don't believe he / she can give me
rights. What I believe in is that Python is a
On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 at 01:16, Left Right via Python-list
wrote:
>
> That's not the discussion that was toxic. But the one that was --
> doesn't exist anymore since the forum owners deleted it.
>
> The part where the forum owners delete whatever they disagree with is
> the toxic part.
Yeah,
ponsibility for the thing
> > they keep the keys to.
>
> Here is the discussion referred to:
> https://discuss.python.org/t/what-is-install-paths-to-in-wheel-file/42005
>
> I don't see anything "toxic" in that discussion. You asked questions
> and people took the time to
ing
> they keep the keys to.
Here is the discussion referred to:
https://discuss.python.org/t/what-is-install-paths-to-in-wheel-file/42005
I don't see anything "toxic" in that discussion. You asked questions
and people took the time to give clear answers.
The basic answer to your questi
Wow. That place turned out to be the toxic pit I didn't expect.
It's a shame that a public discussion of public goods was entrusted to
a bunch of gatekeepers with no sense of responsibility for the thing
they keep the keys to.
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 9:49 PM Left Right wrote:
>
> Thanks. I
Thanks. I tried asking there.
On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 11:53 PM Barry wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24 Dec 2023, at 00:58, Left Right via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to understand the contents of Wheel files
>
>
> There are lots of packaging experts that hang out on
> https://discuss.python.org/
> On 24 Dec 2023, at 00:58, Left Right via Python-list
> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to understand the contents of Wheel files
There are lots of packaging experts that hang out on
https://discuss.python.org/ you are likely to get a response there if not here
replies.
Barry
--
Sorry, I found that this... documentation continues, but it doesn't
make anything better. Here's what this PEP has to add (text in square
brackets are my questions):
If a package needs to find its files at runtime, it can request they
be written to a specified file or files [does this mean a
Hello list.
I'm trying to understand the contents of Wheel files. I was reading
https://peps.python.org/pep-0491/ specifically the paragraph that
states:
Install-Paths-To is a location relative to the archive that will be
overwritten with the install-time paths of each category in the
install
19 matches
Mail list logo
