Michael Ekstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ME) wrote:
ME I've used both wxPython and PyGTK. I find wxPython to be horribly
ME un-pythonic; combining that some problems on the Mac, and some
ME other installation/environment issues, I ditched it for PyGTK.
But AFAIK GTK doesn't have a native
Hardly a showstopper: gtk works now (with X11), and will work even
better soon (native).
:-)
--
Ciao, Renato
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Paul Boddie on comp.lang.python said:
Now, since the commercial licence is per developer, some cunning
outfit could claim that only one developer wrote their product (rather
than one hundred developers, say), but this would be a fairly big
breach of trust (although nothing unusual in the
Op 2006-03-13, Paul Boddie schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
licence, as is their right as the
Alan Franzoni wrote:
Just one thing I don't understand: if you're developing all your software
inside your company, how would they know if you already coded it or you
still have to?
I have no idea. But as I said elsewhere, I'm not in any sense a party
to the process that would attempt to
On 14 Mar 2006 06:10:19 -0800, Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Franzoni wrote:
Just one thing I don't understand: if you're developing all your software
inside your company, how would they know if you already coded it or you
still have to?
I have no idea. But as I said
Am Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:10:09 +0100 schrieb Sybren Stuvel:
Thomas Guettler enlightened us with:
The licence for QT is GPL, this means you cannot use it in
commercial application. That is why I never looked at it.
Ehmm... from their website:
From
Thomas Guettler enlightened us with:
There is a GPL version for Linux. But the GPL does not allow linking
with closed source software.
The availability of a GPL license does not negate the availability of
a commercial license. You can write commercial, closed source software
on Linux using Qt
Thomas Guettler wrote:
Have you read all the text?
Two qualities of the Qt Commercial License should be emphasized:
You need it before you start development of proprietary software.
You must purchase a Qt Commercial License from Trolltech or from any of
its authorized resellers before
Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
licence, as is their right as the owner of the copyrighted work.
What is the deal here? Why would they refuse, to
On 13 Mar 2006 10:19:05 -0800, Paul Rubin
http://phr.cx@nospam.invalid wrote:
Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
licence, as is their right as the
Paul Rubin wrote:
Paul Boddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What people don't usually understand (or rather complain about loudly)
is that Trolltech can refuse to license Qt to you under the commercial
licence, as is their right as the owner of the copyrighted work.
What is the deal here?
i'm pretty much a newbie, too, and have been dabbling with some gui
tools
so far, i like pythoncard pretty well
it wraps wxpython and seems to be pretty easy to use
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
You guys are great :) thanx for the plenty answers and suggestions; I've
made my search through a little more and decided to start coding the
same app first with pygtk and second with wxpython.. and perhaps later
with pyqt.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Alan Franzoni wrote:
FLTK was interesting but seems to lack maintenance and support,
Looking at the News section of the project's home page, I can see
that updates were few and far between in 2004 and 2005, but the
action seems to have picked up again since:
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:07:52 +0100
Alan Franzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
again to make a choice is difficult; is there also some guy liking
pyqt is it worse or should it be avoided because of the licencing
policy for qt (which I also like..)?
* Which one is the most fun to program
invitro81 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But I've no idea which one I should use to start with..
One thing you'll need to carefully decide is where you want
to end up. The different toolkits have different limits on
where you can go. A simple example is printing.
Hello
I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing my own
nice editor with python; so I've to choose among all those GUI toolkit's
On 3/10/06, invitro81 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I've no idea which one I should use to start with.. I've read that
tkinter seems to be the de facto standart in the pyhon community; but
why? Is it the best available one or are theire other reasons? I read
also a litte about wxpython and
invitro81 schreef:
Hello
I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing my own
nice editor with python; so I've to choose among all
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:36:18 +0100, invitro81 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I've recently learnt python and I do love it! I congratulate all those
geeks who produce this nice language; well, because I could be called a
nearby newbee I've decided to improve my abilities by writing my own
Thomas Guettler enlightened us with:
The licence for QT is GPL, this means you cannot use it in
commercial application. That is why I never looked at it.
Ehmm... from their website:
The Qt Commercial License is the correct license to use for the
construction of proprietary, commercial
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas Guettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
.
.
tkinter (or better TK) has no good table widget.
.
.
.
URL:
Hi,in stead of going for the traditional GUIS like wxPython, PyGtk and the like, you could consider using a browser based GUI. Try CherryPy for instance. See also here:
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/442481regards,Dimitri On 3/10/06,
invitro81
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
invitro81 on comp.lang.python said:
again to make a choice is difficult; is there also some guy liking pyqt
is it worse or should it be avoided because of the licencing policy for
qt (which I also like..)?
* Which one is the most fun to program with?
* Which one is the most
25 matches
Mail list logo
