Hi !
Seems to me there are a lot of python packages that are available
through the MacPorts. In the built-in framework, there are only a few
basic packages. Fink gives the same benefits than MacPorts, but there
might be fewer packages available though it than through MacPorts.
That's why I use
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't
think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term packages?
On Tue, June 30, 2009 8:11 am, Alexandre Quessy wrote:
Hi !
Seems to me there are a lot
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I
don't
think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term packages?
Pygame for example, that is a pain
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't
think availability of packages is a concern.
Unless I'm misinterpreting the term packages?
Pygame for
That makes a great deal of sense. I tried to mess with pygame at one
time, but as you stated, it was such a pain to build I gave up.
Leonardo Santagada wrote:
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
I can certainly add any packages I like to my
My experience shows me that using fink or macports with python framework
create problems with version mismatches and library duplication. So now, I
only use the framework because i want to learn. With a little patience and
trying a lot (with the help of google), I gradually install what I want,
Thanks but I do not want MacPorts or fink, I want to do it myself with only
the tools of mac os x
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fink-vs-MacPorts-vs-Framework-tp24271594p24278207.html
Sent from the Python - pythonmac-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
