> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:12 PM
> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: qa@openoffice.apache.org; l...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of
> ApacheOpenOffice
> -Original Message-
> From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:dennis.hamil...@acm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 8:12 PM
> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: qa@openoffice.apache.org; l...@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] General Availability of
> ApacheOpenOffice
Resending to 3 lists... I suggest to have a "canonical" reply-to to the
dev list for the next messages. Andrea
Andrea Pescetti wrote:
On 23/08/2016 Kay Schenk wrote:
WARNING: This is quite long!
And the discussion was even longer, but I'll start with answering this one.
And I'll first note
Hi Andrea
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> On 24/08/2016 Pedro Lino wrote:
>
>> There seems to be a problem updating the html page (at least for the
>> Windows builds)
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>> compared to
>>
Pedro Lino wrote:
They are matching today. Apparently it takes some time (a day?) for the
page to update.
It is done automatically, but I have no idea when the cron jobs run.
Yes, that is a workaround. So the simple answer to ftp is no.
Indeed. No FTP.
BTW does the daily build mean
On 24/08/2016 Don Lewis wrote:
* Updated bundled serf to fix a CVE and a WebDAV issue. The FreeBSD
port has been using the system version of the latest and greatest.
We've been discussing this separately. This will make the build system
even more complex, but it does have advantages