Applied on stable branch.
2008/1/13, Andrzej Zaborowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Andrzej Zaborowski balrog 08/01/14 01:52:52
Modified files:
hw : vmware_vga.c
Log message:
Register io ports as
Applied on stable branch.
2008/1/14, Andrzej Zaborowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Andrzej Zaborowski balrog 08/01/14 03:48:37
Modified files:
. : block-vmdk.c
Log message:
Add a path length check
I've set up an experimental bug track for Qemu stable branch. If the
community wants it can be used for qemu head too.
If the community agrees, I will do the configuration to send an email
to qemu mailing list when a bug is opened.
Let me know if someone (especially the developers that have
So, Lauros, seems like all the commits since 0.9.1 (including the two new
ones, Fix typo which broke MIPS32R2 64-bit FPU support and qemu
manpage: describe arguments of usbdevice option, by Aurelien Jarno) are
candidates for the stable branch...
applied.
Lauro
As discussed yesterday in the qemu irc channel, I've created a stable
branch for qemu 0.9.1. This branch will follow two basic rules:
1. Only fixes will be applied.
2. Patches will be applied only after they are applied on qemu head.
The repository is
I think these patches are important bugfixes and they should be
applied on the qemu head.
They fix some LTP tests.
Lauro
2007/12/11, Thayne Harbaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The EFAULT changes use a result of NULL to detect a failure from lock*()
functions. There are syscalls that accept NULL as a
) . In 2008, I will work full time on qemu and I
will need a stable version.
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa Labs - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
Recife - Brazil
The attached patch fixes a bug in getgroups and getgroups32 syscalls.
The current implementation returns error when size=0.
According the manual:
If size is zero, list is not modified, but the total number of
supplementary group IDs for the process is returned.
--
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa
of
QEMU.
For more details:
http://qemu-arm-eabi.sf.net/.
The current QEMU-ARM-EABI version was synchronized last wednesday with
QEMU CVS and it's working well. It was tested with Maemo/Scratchbox
and Mamona.
Contributions are welcome.
--
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa Labs - Instituto Nokia de
and it has never been applied.
I think this project contributes to QEMU as it groups and updates the
patches, making easier to test and apply them to the mainstream.
This project will be dead in the near future when these patches are
available in the mainstream QEMU.
--
Lauro Ramos Venancio
co
http://dev.openbossa.org/svn/mamona/qemu-omap/trunk;.
To browse the source, go to
http://dev.openbossa.org/trac/mamona/browser/qemu-omap/trunk
Contributions are welcome.
In few days, I will make a more complete announce.
Lauro Ramos Venancio
OpenBossa Labs
Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
Recife
I'm sending a new version of the patch that uses Base Restored data
abort model.
Lauro
diff -ru qemu-0.9.0.orig/target-arm/translate.c qemu-0.9.0/target-arm/translate.c
--- qemu-0.9.0.orig/target-arm/translate.c 2007-03-16 11:41:28.0 -0300
+++ qemu-0.9.0/target-arm/translate.c 2007-03-16
Qemu-arm is wrongly executing post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are
the same register. For example:
ldr r0, [r1], +r0
Current behavior:
r0 - [r1]
r1 - r1 + r0
Expected behavior:
addr - r1
r1 - r1 + r0
r0 - [addr]
The attached patch fixes this bug. Patched by me and Rodrigo Vivi.
This patch was
Now sending the attachment. :)
Lauro
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 16:35 -0300, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote:
Qemu-arm is wrongly executing post-indexed loads when Rm and Rd are
the same register. For example:
ldr r0, [r1], +r0
Current behavior:
r0 - [r1]
r1 - r1 + r0
Expected behavior
14 matches
Mail list logo
