On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:39 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:53:08AM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> > VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID is the feature bit, not the bitmask. Since
> > the device under test also provided VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 and
> >
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:53:08AM +0100, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
> VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID is the feature bit, not the bitmask. Since
> the device under test also provided VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 and
> VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_BATCH, this went unnoticed.
>
> Fixes: c1a1008685 ("vdpa: always
On 1/17/23 11:53, Eugenio Pérez wrote:
VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID is the feature bit, not the bitmask. Since
the device under test also provided VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 and
VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_BATCH, this went unnoticed.
Fixes: c1a1008685 ("vdpa: always start CVQ in SVQ mode if
VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_ASID is the feature bit, not the bitmask. Since
the device under test also provided VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_MSG_V2 and
VHOST_BACKEND_F_IOTLB_BATCH, this went unnoticed.
Fixes: c1a1008685 ("vdpa: always start CVQ in SVQ mode if possible")
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez
Acked-by: