On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 7:44 PM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/1/24 23:14, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:15 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/29/24 22:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:54 AM Daniel Henrique
On 2/1/24 23:14, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:15 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
On 1/29/24 22:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:54 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
until
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 5:15 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/29/24 22:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:54 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> >> until now, we were implying
On 1/29/24 22:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:54 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
until now, we were implying that they were available.
We can't do this anymore since named features also has a
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 5:54 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> until now, we were implying that they were available.
>
> We can't do this anymore since named features also has a riscv,isa
> entry. Let's add them to
The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
until now, we were implying that they were available.
We can't do this anymore since named features also has a riscv,isa
entry. Let's add them to riscv_cpu_named_features[].
They will also need to be explicitly enabled in both