On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 02:52:14PM +0800, Zhao Liu wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> > Please describe it in terms of a QAPI definition, as that's what we're
> > striving for with all QEMU public interfaces. Once the QAPI design is
> > agreed, then the -object mapping is trivial, as -object's JSON format
>
Hi Daniel,
> Please describe it in terms of a QAPI definition, as that's what we're
> striving for with all QEMU public interfaces. Once the QAPI design is
> agreed, then the -object mapping is trivial, as -object's JSON format
> supports arbitrary QAPI structures.
Thank you for your guidance!
oth ARM and x86, I'd like to discuss my API
> thinking with you. ;-)
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 06:29:25PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:29:25 +0100
> > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] arm/kvm: Enable suppo
25PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 18:29:25 +0100
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] arm/kvm: Enable support for
> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER
>
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:49:40PM -0400, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> > T
Hi Daniel,
On 4/16/24 01:29, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:49:40PM -0400, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
The KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER provides the ability to let the VMM decide
which PMU events are provided to the guest. Add a new option
`kvm-pmu-filter` as -cpu sub-option to
On Wed, Apr 10 2024, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09/04/2024 09.47, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
>> Hi Thmoas,
>>
>> On 4/9/24 13:33, Thomas Huth wrote:
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "kvm-pmu-filter");
>>>
>>> So you assert here that the feature is available ...
>>>
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:49:40PM -0400, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
> The KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER provides the ability to let the VMM decide
> which PMU events are provided to the guest. Add a new option
> `kvm-pmu-filter` as -cpu sub-option to set the PMU Event Filtering.
> Without the filter, all
On 09/04/2024 09.47, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
Hi Thmoas,
On 4/9/24 13:33, Thomas Huth wrote:
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "kvm-pmu-filter");
So you assert here that the feature is available ...
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "kvm-steal-time");
Hi Thmoas,
On 4/9/24 13:33, Thomas Huth wrote:
+ assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "kvm-pmu-filter");
So you assert here that the feature is available ...
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "kvm-steal-time");
assert_has_feature(qts, "host", "sve");
resp =
On 09/04/2024 04.49, Shaoqin Huang wrote:
The KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER provides the ability to let the VMM decide
which PMU events are provided to the guest. Add a new option
`kvm-pmu-filter` as -cpu sub-option to set the PMU Event Filtering.
Without the filter, all PMU events are exposed from
The KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER provides the ability to let the VMM decide
which PMU events are provided to the guest. Add a new option
`kvm-pmu-filter` as -cpu sub-option to set the PMU Event Filtering.
Without the filter, all PMU events are exposed from host to guest by
default. The usage of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
