On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:06:22 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
01.11.2013 13:54, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
That looks right. Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
you
04.11.2013 00:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
If Jan picks it up, that's fine. If not, I think it can go
to the trivial patches queue.
Works fine, applied to queues/slirp.
Okay, thank you Jan.
But this is not a trivial patch as the fix is not obvious
On 2013-11-04 14:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
04.11.2013 00:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
If Jan picks it up, that's fine. If not, I think it can go
to the trivial patches queue.
Works fine, applied to queues/slirp.
Okay, thank you Jan.
But this
On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
01.11.2013 13:54, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
That looks right. Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
you initially submitted? If yes, I'll make a formal patch
01.11.2013 13:54, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400
Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
That looks right. Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
you initially submitted? If yes, I'll make a formal patch submission
upstream.
Here you go.
Thank you!
