Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility

2018-02-05 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 02/05/2018 10:34 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 05.02.2018 10:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> For now, the kernel does not properly indicate configured CPU subfunctions >> to the guest, but simply uses the host values (as support in KVM is still >> missing). That's why we missed to model

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility

2018-02-05 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 05.02.2018 10:09, David Hildenbrand wrote: > For now, the kernel does not properly indicate configured CPU subfunctions > to the guest, but simply uses the host values (as support in KVM is still > missing). That's why we missed to model the PTFF subfunctions that come > with Multiple-epoch

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility

2018-02-05 Thread no-reply
Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20180205090912.6110-1-da...@redhat.com Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] s390x/cpumodel: model PTFF subfunctions for Multiple-epoch facility

2018-02-05 Thread David Hildenbrand
For now, the kernel does not properly indicate configured CPU subfunctions to the guest, but simply uses the host values (as support in KVM is still missing). That's why we missed to model the PTFF subfunctions that come with Multiple-epoch facility. Let's properly add these, along with a new