On 12/5/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/4/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be surprised if an SMP kernel actually worked on a multi CPU SS5.
Prepare for a surprise:
That's interesting because the fact that it works shows how
On 12/4/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5
On 12/4/07, Thiemo Seufer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5
Am 04.12.2007 um 00:53 schrieb Thiemo Seufer:
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
16 CPUs
If you want to make a 16
CPU, 64 Gb machine, define a QEMU specific machine. There are no real
32 bit sparc systems like that.
I believe the Cray CS6400 was a 64-way sparc32 machine with 16Gb ram.
Admittedly it's a sun4d variant, not sun4m. I've no idea how much difference
(if any) that
On 12/4/07, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want to make a 16
CPU, 64 Gb machine, define a QEMU specific machine. There are no real
32 bit sparc systems like that.
I believe the Cray CS6400 was a 64-way sparc32 machine with 16Gb ram.
Admittedly it's a sun4d variant, not sun4m.
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/4/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be surprised if an SMP kernel actually worked on a multi CPU SS5.
Prepare for a surprise:
That's interesting because the fact that it works shows how inaccurate
the emulation is.
Now could you please
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
16 CPUs and 2 gigabytes of memory, it doesn't break anything to have
this
Blue Swirl wrote:
On 12/3/07, Robert Reif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
While it's not historically accurate to emulate a Sparcstation 5 with
16 CPUs and 2 gigabytes of memory, it doesn't
This patch sets the maximum number of CPUs and memory to what is
supported by the actual hardware.
Index: hw/sun4m.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/hw/sun4m.c,v
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -p -u -r1.66 sun4m.c
--- hw/sun4m.c 2
10 matches
Mail list logo