On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:12:41PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU, the code was changed to use the full RAM size, and this broke the
build_srat()
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:12:41PM -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU, the code was changed to use the full RAM size, and this broke the
build_srat()
On Do, 2014-01-09 at 17:12 -0200, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU, the code was changed to use the full RAM size, and this broke
the
build_srat() code that
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:12:41 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU, the code was changed to use the full RAM size, and this broke the
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:17:14PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 17:12:41 -0200
Eduardo Habkost ehabk...@redhat.com wrote:
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU,
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU, the code was changed to use the full RAM size, and this broke the
build_srat() code that handles the PCI hole.
This series fixes the problem by
On 01/09/14 20:12, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
The original SeaBIOS code used the RamSize variable, that was used by
SeaBIOS for the size of RAM below 4GB, not for all RAM. When copied to
QEMU, the code was changed to use the full RAM size, and this broke the
build_srat() code that handles the PCI
