On 2013-07-14 17:18, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 14 July 2013 14:05, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Also, what devices exactly would have a non-native byte order?!? I'm
confused...
MMIO/PIO requests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 16/07/2013 09:18, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
Sorry for sending out invitations and then being late to this party
- vacation. What is the status now? Do we have a short-term plan to
avoid the regression or is this better solved by cleaning up the
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 16/07/2013 09:18, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
Sorry for sending out invitations and then being late to this party
- vacation. What is the status now? Do we have a short-term plan to
avoid the regression or is this better
Il 16/07/2013 18:59, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 16/07/2013 09:18, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
Sorry for sending out invitations and then being late to this party
- vacation. What is the status now? Do we have a short-term
Il 13/07/2013 17:22, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
1) MMIO request goes to sPAPR PIO area, the vCPU was in BE mode but by
the time the handler is called, the value is in host byte order.
2) sPAPR (incorrectly) byte swaps by marking the region as little
endian (data is now garbage)
3) The
Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com writes:
Il 13/07/2013 17:22, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
1) MMIO request goes to sPAPR PIO area, the vCPU was in BE mode but by
the time the handler is called, the value is in host byte order.
2) sPAPR (incorrectly) byte swaps by marking the region as
On 14 July 2013 14:05, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Also, what devices exactly would have a non-native byte order?!? I'm
confused...
MMIO/PIO requests don't have a byte order. It's literally 64 or 32 data
pins that are numbered D0..D31 whereas D0 is the LSB. It doesn't
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 14 July 2013 14:05, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
Also, what devices exactly would have a non-native byte order?!? I'm
confused...
MMIO/PIO requests don't have a byte order. It's literally 64 or
On 14 July 2013 16:18, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
Devices themselves do have a byte order, though, right? Specifically,
if you do a 32 bit read of address 0 on a device and an 8 bit read,
It
Il 11/07/2013 14:46, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
sPAPR has its MemoryRegion marked Little Endian:
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 11/07/2013 14:46, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
sPAPR has its MemoryRegion marked Little Endian:
Anthony Liguori a écrit :
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Il 11/07/2013 14:46, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
sPAPR has its MemoryRegion marked Little Endian:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
This patch breaks VGA on PPC as it is in master today.
If I don't mark portio as little endian it works as expected. There's
probably someone swapping things twice.
This is the correct fix. Can you please
Am 12.07.2013 um 14:56 schrieb Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws:
Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de writes:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
This patch breaks VGA on PPC as it is in master today.
If I don't mark portio as little endian it works as expected. There's
Hervé Poussineau hpous...@reactos.org writes:
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex beast, mostly due to the
need to deal with old portio interface users. But we can overcome it
without converting all portio users by
On 24.06.2013, at 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-06-23 22:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex beast, mostly due to the
need to deal with old portio interface users. But we can overcome it
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.06.2013, at 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-06-23 22:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex beast, mostly due to the
need to deal with
Am 11.07.2013 14:34, schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.06.2013, at 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-06-23 22:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex
On 11.07.2013, at 14:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 11.07.2013 14:34, schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.06.2013, at 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-06-23 22:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka
On 11.07.2013, at 14:48, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 11.07.2013 14:34, schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.06.2013, at 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-06-23 22:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
Jan
On 11.07.2013, at 15:28, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:48, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 11.07.2013 14:34, schrieb Alexander Graf:
On 11.07.2013, at 14:29, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.06.2013, at 08:07, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2013-06-23 22:50, Hervé Poussineau wrote:
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex beast, mostly due to the
need to deal with old portio interface users. But we can overcome it
without converting all portio users by embedding
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex beast, mostly due to the
need to deal with old portio interface users. But we can overcome it
without converting all portio users by embedding the required base
address of a
From: Jan Kiszka jan.kis...@siemens.com
The current ioport dispatcher is a complex beast, mostly due to the
need to deal with old portio interface users. But we can overcome it
without converting all portio users by embedding the required base
address of a MemoryRegionPortio access into that data
24 matches
Mail list logo
