Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] s390x/kvm: Handle bpb feature

2018-01-18 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 01/18/2018 01:01 PM, Halil Pasic wrote: > > > On 01/18/2018 09:56 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> We need to handle the bpb control on reset and migration. Normally >> stfle.82 is transparent (and the normal guest part works without >> hypervisor activity). To prevent any issues we

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] s390x/kvm: Handle bpb feature

2018-01-18 Thread Halil Pasic
On 01/18/2018 09:56 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We need to handle the bpb control on reset and migration. Normally > stfle.82 is transparent (and the normal guest part works without > hypervisor activity). To prevent any issues we require full > host kernel support for this feature. > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] s390x/kvm: Handle bpb feature

2018-01-18 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 18.01.2018 09:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We need to handle the bpb control on reset and migration. Normally > stfle.82 is transparent (and the normal guest part works without > hypervisor activity). To prevent any issues we require full > host kernel support for this feature. > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] s390x/kvm: Handle bpb feature

2018-01-18 Thread Thomas Huth
On 18.01.2018 09:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We need to handle the bpb control on reset and migration. Normally > stfle.82 is transparent (and the normal guest part works without > hypervisor activity). To prevent any issues we require full > host kernel support for this feature. > >

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/3] s390x/kvm: Handle bpb feature

2018-01-18 Thread Christian Borntraeger
We need to handle the bpb control on reset and migration. Normally stfle.82 is transparent (and the normal guest part works without hypervisor activity). To prevent any issues we require full host kernel support for this feature. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger ---