On 11/26/2012 04:48 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:41:00 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:11:32 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
Thanks for the additional details. They were very useful. I was able
to reproduce this when I manually built spice release 0.10.1, but not
with the Fedora 0.10.1 package. One difference I noticed is that the
Fedora version wasn't
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
Thanks again :)
I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
On Monday, November 26, 2012 03:41:00 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 02:59:21 PM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/26/2012 12:08 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, November 26, 2012 11:41:06 AM Corey Bryant wrote:
On 11/21/2012 10:24 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On Wednesday,
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
Thanks again :)
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 05:48:14PM -0200, Eduardo Otubo wrote:
According to the bug 855162[0] - there's the need of adding new syscalls
to the whitelist when using
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:20:44 AM Eduardo Otubo wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
Thanks again :)
I way a bit delayed due to travel, but I started playing with it a bit
yesterday afternoon and
Hello,
Am 21.11.2012 14:20, schrieb Eduardo Otubo:
Does anyone had a chance to take a look at this? We would like to get
this into the 1.3 release.
We're in Hard Freeze, so in theory only bug fixes will get accepted for
v1.3. Patches intended for 1.3 should be marked for-1.3 during this
According to the bug 855162[0] - there's the need of adding new syscalls
to the whitelist when using Qemu with Libvirt.
[0] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855162
v2: Adding new syscalls to the list: readlink, rt_sigpending, and
rt_sigtimedwait
v3:
* Added new syscalls based
11 matches
Mail list logo
