Hi!
On Fri, 31 May 2013 15:45:55 +0100, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 31 May 2013 14:01, Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:34:12 +0100, Peter Maydell
peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
That said, I think any new patches to fpu/ need to
31.05.2013 13:39, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com
---
fpu/softfloat-specialize.h | 15 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git fpu/softfloat-specialize.h fpu/softfloat-specialize.h
index 518f694..83add1a
Il 31/05/2013 14:07, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
31.05.2013 13:39, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com
---
fpu/softfloat-specialize.h | 15 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git fpu/softfloat-specialize.h
On 31 May 2013 13:07, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Hmm. And where's the simplification? Here's context diff for the same:
*** fpu/softfloat-specialize.h.orig 2013-05-31 16:02:51.614710351 +0400
--- fpu/softfloat-specialize.h 2013-05-31 16:02:59.838820308 +0400
***
On 31 May 2013 14:01, Thomas Schwinge tho...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:34:12 +0100, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
That said, I think any new patches to fpu/ need to
come with an explicit statement that they can be
licensed under the softfloat-2a license
Hi!
On Fri, 31 May 2013 13:34:12 +0100, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 31 May 2013 13:07, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Hmm. And where's the simplification? Here's context diff for the same:
*** fpu/softfloat-specialize.h.orig 2013-05-31 16:02:51.614710351
