Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-09-18 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:46 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: >> >> My biggest fear is testing of the changes for the affected boards. >> >> Peter, do you much coverage of these boards in your regressions?

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-09-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 11:14 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:46 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > >> >> My biggest fear is testing of the changes for the affected boards. >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-09-18 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 June 2015 at 23:36, Peter Crosthwaite > wrote >> This series introduced support for multi QOM properties with the same >> name and then moves the ARM CPUs to the MPCore

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-09-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On 14 June 2015 at 23:36, Peter Crosthwaite wrote > This series introduced support for multi QOM properties with the same > name and then moves the ARM CPUs to the MPCore container objects (yes! > they are related!) > > The application of the QOM change is container

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-09-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On 18 September 2015 at 17:46, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > The other one I have in need of a review is: > > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-07/msg05891.html Ah, data-driven device registers. I think I decided I didn't personally care enough about

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-09-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:46 -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote: > >> My biggest fear is testing of the changes for the affected boards. > >> Peter, do you much coverage of these boards in your regressions? Do you > >> have automated tests in a git repo somewhere? > > > > The answers to these questions

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-06-18 Thread Alistair Francis
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Hi All, This series introduced support for multi QOM properties with the same name and then moves the ARM CPUs to the MPCore container objects (yes! they are related!) The application of the QOM change

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-06-15 Thread Liviu Ionescu
On 15 Jun 2015, at 01:36, Peter Crosthwaite peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com wrote: Liviu recently brought up a desire for arguments to QOM constructors. P8 would probably be cleaner if this feature existed, as the number of CPUs could be set as a constructor argument. There is no flexibility

[Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 0/8] QOM prop overloading + ARM MPCore CPUs

2015-06-14 Thread Peter Crosthwaite
Hi All, This series introduced support for multi QOM properties with the same name and then moves the ARM CPUs to the MPCore container objects (yes! they are related!) The application of the QOM change is container objects passing through a single property on multiple same-type children as a