On 31 March 2014 20:57, Michael Roth mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Agreed, though I feel a little weird about creating releases for tags that
aren't in the official repo. Would that be acceptable from a community
stand-point? I'm honestly not sure.
Otherwise I think Anthony/Peter would
Hi,
Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please:
* -rc1 has not been tagged.
* Who besides Anthony could upload a tarball if we tag and create it?
* make-release
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:51:31PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please:
* -rc1 has not been tagged.
* Who besides
On 31/03/14 12:51, Andreas Färber wrote:
Hi,
Am 31.03.2014 12:40, schrieb Juan Quintela:
Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering.
I would like to discuss the state of the QEMU release process, please:
* -rc1 has not been tagged.
* Who besides Anthony could upload a
On 31 March 2014 14:21, Christian Borntraeger borntrae...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Another thing might be the release process in general. Currently it seems
that everybody tries to push everything just before the hard freeze. I had
to debug some problems introduced _after_ soft freeze. Is there some
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 31 March 2014 14:21, Christian Borntraeger borntrae...@de.ibm.com wrote:
Another thing might be the release process in general. Currently it seems
that everybody tries to push everything just before the hard
Il 31/03/2014 16:01, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
merge window has been suggested before. I think it would be
a terrible idea for QEMU, personally. We're not the kernel in
many ways, notably dev community size and a greater tendency
to changes that have effects across the whole tree.
Soft +
On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful service,
just like you were; putting too much work on his shoulders risks getting us
in the
Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful service,
just like you were; putting too much
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
manager roles. Peter is providing the
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and
Quoting Andreas Färber (2014-03-31 09:46:45)
Am 31.03.2014 16:32, schrieb Peter Maydell:
On 31 March 2014 15:28, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to separate the committer and release
manager roles. Peter is providing the community with a wonderful
12 matches
Mail list logo
