Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon
receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably immediately determine
why it occurred. eg, triggered by watchdog, or by guest OS request. There
are actually 3 possible sequences
-
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon
receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably immediately determine
why it occurred. eg, triggered by watchdog, or by guest OS request. There
are actually 3 possible sequences
Note that
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:41:45AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
I have two not so related QMP events issues two discuss, but I will talk
about
them in the same email to avoid starting two threads.
The first problem is wrt the STOP event. Right now it's only emitted if
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon
receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to reliably immediately determine
why it occurred. eg,
On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For further backgrou, the key end goal here is that in a QMP client, upon
receipt of the 'RESET' event, we need to
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:12:20 +
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:41:45AM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Hi there,
I have two not so related QMP events issues two discuss, but I will talk
about
them in the same email to avoid starting two
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:37 -0600
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
For further backgrou, the key
On 02/08/2010 12:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:37 -0600
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 08:49:20AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:12 AM, Daniel
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:14:24 -0600
Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/08/2010 12:25 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:37 -0600
Anthony Liguorianth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/08/2010 08:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08,
On 02/08/2010 01:59 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
Looks reasonable to me, what do think Daniel?
Note that if we agree on the 'context design', I'll have to change
VNC's events names..
Let me give you a few suggestions before diving into it. context might
not be the best name.
For
10 matches
Mail list logo
