Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
Cover letter should be marked [PATCH 0/2]. Otherwise it defeats
filtering.
Would like to see a Reviewed-by from someone before applying this.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
v2 update:
- set
On 07/18/2013 01:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
Cover letter should be marked [PATCH 0/2]. Otherwise it defeats
filtering.
Would like to see a Reviewed-by from someone before applying this.
Il 18/07/2013 18:35, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto:
On 07/18/2013 01:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
Cover letter should be marked [PATCH 0/2]. Otherwise it defeats
filtering.
Would like to
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 06:37:15 PM Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 18/07/2013 18:35, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto:
On 07/18/2013 01:28 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Eduardo Otubo ot...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
Cover letter should be marked
On 18 July 2013 20:39, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On the plus side, I think libseccomp is very close to being pretty much
feature complete (excluding new architectures that may pop up, at present we
are only x86, x86_64, x32, and ARM)
...AArch64 ? :-)
-- PMM
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 08:48:10 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 July 2013 20:39, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On the plus side, I think libseccomp is very close to being pretty much
feature complete (excluding new architectures that may pop up, at present
we are only x86, x86_64,
On 18 July 2013 21:05, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 08:48:10 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 July 2013 20:39, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On the plus side, I think libseccomp is very close to being pretty much
feature complete (excluding new
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 10:31:46 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 July 2013 21:05, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 08:48:10 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
On 18 July 2013 20:39, Paul Moore pmo...@redhat.com wrote:
On the plus side, I think libseccomp is very close
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
v2 update:
- set libseccomp 2.1.0 as requirement on configure script.
- removed setrlimit and added sendfile64 to the whitelist.
1) Remove the ifdef's for the (not so) new libseccomp version that does
a
best effort and
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
1) Remove the ifdef's for the (not so) new libseccomp version that does
a
best effort and translates x86_32 syscalls into x86_64 when possible.
2) Remove unused syscalls on the seccomp whitelist. For that removal, I've
been
Hello all,
In this small patch series I basically:
1) Remove the ifdef's for the (not so) new libseccomp version that does
a
best effort and translates x86_32 syscalls into x86_64 when possible.
2) Remove unused syscalls on the seccomp whitelist. For that removal, I've
been
11 matches
Mail list logo
