Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU GUI-Frontend based on Libvert API

2006-07-23 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:21:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:37:10 -0400, Evan Paul wrote: The libVirt project is a community-sponsored project that aims to bring more simplicity and standards to the Linux VM world. At its core, libVirt is a C toolkit that

[Qemu-devel] Full Virtualization Mode Crashs Kernel on Guest Machine

2006-07-23 Thread Cai Qian
Hi, When I use -kernel-kqemu option, it crash the guest machine's kernel. The command is, qemu-system-x86_64 -kernel-kqemu -k en-gb -m 400M -net nic, -net tap foobar.img The log can be found in attachment. System Information, qemu-0.8.2 kqemu-1.3.0pre9 linux-2.6.16 (host) Ubuntu edgy x86_64

Re: [Qemu-devel] Full Virtualization Mode Crashs Kernel on Guest Machine

2006-07-23 Thread Fabrice Bellard
Hi, Full virtualization (-kernel-kqemu option) is currently not supported for 64 bit guest OSes (to be exact it is implemented but not debugged yet !). I just added a note in the online kqemu documentation. Regards, Fabrice. Cai Qian wrote: Hi, When I use -kernel-kqemu option, it crash

[Qemu-devel] QEMU version 0.8.2

2006-07-23 Thread Fabrice Bellard
Hi, QEMU version 0.8.2 is out. You can download it at http://bellard.org/qemu/download.html. Change log for version 0.8.2: - ACPI support - PC VGA BIOS fixes - switch to OpenBios for SPARC targets (Blue Swirl) - VNC server fixes - MIPS FPU support (Marius Groeger) - Solaris/SPARC

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU GUI-Frontend based on Libvert API

2006-07-23 Thread Evan Paul
Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 02:21:21PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:37:10 -0400, Evan Paul wrote: The libVirt project is a community-sponsored project that aims to bring more simplicity and standards to the Linux VM world. At its core,

[Qemu-devel] Re: Re: QEMU GUI-Frontend based on Libvert API

2006-07-23 Thread Anthony Liguori
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:39:29 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: I have toyed around with the idea of writing an XML-RPC front-end to QEMU (with the idea of bridging the gap for libvirt). DV also had a patch floating around to add a socket management interface to QEMU (although now there is a

[Qemu-devel] Feature request for qcow v2

2006-07-23 Thread Anthony Liguori
Hi, I've been playing with some code to implement an HTTP block device in QEMU. I'll post when I've got something working. As I am building this though, I thought of something that would be nice to have for qcow v2. What I'd like is essentially a copy-on-read flag. If this flag is set,

[Qemu-devel] qemu 0.8.2 update - please test! (and usb cardreader SET_ADDR_FAILED)

2006-07-23 Thread Juergen Lock
With the help of Lonnie Mendez (he updated his usb host support patch) I just put together an experimental qemu port update. For some reason my usb cardreader didnt want to work today: uhub1: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1 (anyone have an idea about this one? this is

[Qemu-devel] high CPU load / async IO?

2006-07-23 Thread Sven Köhler
Hi, sorry for bothering, but the last time i heard something about asyn IO was on Feb 2nd. Fabrice said: [quote] I have at least 5 items on my TODO list : 1) New kqemu which virtualizes both user and kernel code (currently in alpha stage but not released yet). 2) DMA block I/O (merged) 3) async

[Qemu-devel] FreeBSD! :) (was: Re: qemu 0.8.2 update - please test! (and usb cardreader SET_ADDR_FAILED))

2006-07-23 Thread Juergen Lock
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:40:41AM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: With the help of Lonnie Mendez (he updated his usb host support patch) I just put together an experimental qemu port update. ... As you maybe guessed from the mail header (To:) I'm talking about the FreeBSD port of qemu. Sorry if I

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix select loop to handle handler deletions

2006-07-23 Thread Anthony Liguori
The current select loop can SEGV if a handler removes itself. The following patch changes the select loop to be safe no matter how the io handler list is changed. It definitely changes the complexity of the dispatch but since there are usually so few fds, I don't think it really matters.