Am 02.04.2024 um 12:53 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> On 27/3/24 20:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
> > that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check.
> > In fact, all of the callers pass a
On 27/3/24 20:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check.
In fact, all of the callers pass a non-NULL pointer, so just remove the
misleading check.
Resolves: Coverity CID
On 27/3/24 20:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check.
In fact, all of the callers pass a non-NULL pointer, so just remove the
misleading check.
Resolves: Coverity CID
Am 27.03.24 um 20:27 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
> that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check.
> In fact, all of the callers pass a non-NULL pointer, so just remove the
> misleading check.
>
>
Coverity complains that the check introduced in commit 3f934817 suggests
that qiov could be NULL and we dereference it before reaching the check.
In fact, all of the callers pass a non-NULL pointer, so just remove the
misleading check.
Resolves: Coverity CID 1542668
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
---
