Please excuse my late reply; I was on vacation.
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:40:24AM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>> This patch adds support for asynchronously tearing down a VM on Linux.
>>
>> When qemu terminates, either naturally or because of a fatal signal,
>>
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 09:26:23AM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:05:52 -0300
> Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
>
> > On 8/11/22 11:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>> Hmm, I was hoping you could just use SIGKILL to guarantee that this
> > >>> gets killed off.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 08:38:59 -0300
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
> On 8/12/22 04:26, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:05:52 -0300
> > Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/11/22 11:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >> [...]
> > Hmm, I was hoping you could just
On 8/12/22 04:26, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:05:52 -0300
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
On 8/11/22 11:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
Hmm, I was hoping you could just use SIGKILL to guarantee that this
gets killed off. Is SIGKILL delivered too soon to allow for the
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:05:52 -0300
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
> On 8/11/22 11:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> [...]
> >>> Hmm, I was hoping you could just use SIGKILL to guarantee that this
> >>> gets killed off. Is SIGKILL delivered too soon to allow for the
> >>> main QEMU process to have
On 8/11/22 11:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
[...]
Hmm, I was hoping you could just use SIGKILL to guarantee that this
gets killed off. Is SIGKILL delivered too soon to allow for the
main QEMU process to have exited quickly ?
yes, I tried. qemu has not finished exiting when the signal is
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 03:56:23PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:27:44 +0100
> Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:40:24AM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > > This patch adds support for asynchronously tearing down a VM on Linux.
> > >
> > >
On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:27:44 +0100
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:40:24AM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > This patch adds support for asynchronously tearing down a VM on Linux.
> >
> > When qemu terminates, either naturally or because of a fatal signal,
> > the VM is
Am 11.08.22 um 14:27 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé:
[...]
--- a/qemu-options.hx
+++ b/qemu-options.hx
@@ -4743,6 +4743,23 @@ HXCOMM Internal use
DEF("qtest", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_qtest, "", QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
DEF("qtest-log", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_qtest_log, "", QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
+#ifdef
On Tue, Aug 09, 2022 at 08:40:24AM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> This patch adds support for asynchronously tearing down a VM on Linux.
>
> When qemu terminates, either naturally or because of a fatal signal,
> the VM is torn down. If the VM is huge, it can take a considerable
> amount of time
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 17:30:41 -0300
Murilo Opsfelder Araújo wrote:
> Hi, Claudio.
Hi Murilo,
[...]
> I've smoke-tested this on ppc and everything looks fine.
> For what's worth:
>
> Reviewed-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo
> Tested-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo
thanks a lot for testing this!
>
Hi, Claudio.
On 8/9/22 03:40, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
This patch adds support for asynchronously tearing down a VM on Linux.
When qemu terminates, either naturally or because of a fatal signal,
the VM is torn down. If the VM is huge, it can take a considerable
amount of time for it to be
This patch adds support for asynchronously tearing down a VM on Linux.
When qemu terminates, either naturally or because of a fatal signal,
the VM is torn down. If the VM is huge, it can take a considerable
amount of time for it to be cleaned up. In case of a protected VM, it
might take even
13 matches
Mail list logo
