Hi Hanna and Kevin,
any updates?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 02:29:25PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Thomas Weißschuh writes:
>
> > Only a small subset of all blockdev drivers make sense for firmware
> > images. Introduce and use a new enum to represent this.
> >
> > This also reduces the
Thomas Weißschuh writes:
> Only a small subset of all blockdev drivers make sense for firmware
> images. Introduce and use a new enum to represent this.
>
> This also reduces the dependency of firmware.json on the global qapi
> definitions.
>
> Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 01:08:19PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 11/3/24 12:46, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > Only a small subset of all blockdev drivers make sense for firmware
> > images. Introduce and use a new enum to represent this.
> >
> > This also reduces the dependency of
On 11/3/24 12:46, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Only a small subset of all blockdev drivers make sense for firmware
images. Introduce and use a new enum to represent this.
This also reduces the dependency of firmware.json on the global qapi
definitions.
Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
Only a small subset of all blockdev drivers make sense for firmware
images. Introduce and use a new enum to represent this.
This also reduces the dependency of firmware.json on the global qapi
definitions.
Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrangé
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
