On Dec 13, 2007 3:15 AM, Thayne Harbaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:21 +, Paul Brook wrote:
- It would be good to limit the changes in the CPU emulation code to
handle the TLS. For example, on MIPS, the TLS register must not be
stored in the CPU state. Same
Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
I believe Paul Brook did the original patch for arm eabi TLS. The patch
has bounced around for a bit but hasn't been applied. We've been using
this patch for a while and have tweaked it to be a bit more correct as
far as code organization.
Please let me know what
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:21 +, Paul Brook wrote:
- It would be good to limit the changes in the CPU emulation code to
handle the TLS. For example, on MIPS, the TLS register must not be
stored in the CPU state. Same for ARM.
I disagree. The TLS register is part of the CPU state. On
I believe Paul Brook did the original patch for arm eabi TLS. The patch
has bounced around for a bit but hasn't been applied. We've been using
this patch for a while and have tweaked it to be a bit more correct as
far as code organization.
Please let me know what else should be improved for
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
I believe Paul Brook did the original patch for arm eabi TLS. The patch
has bounced around for a bit but hasn't been applied. We've been using
this patch for a while and have tweaked it to be a bit more correct as
far as code
