Il 05/03/2013 03:33, Hu Tao ha scritto:
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:30:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/02/2013 13:13, Hu Tao ha scritto:
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
I
Il 28/02/2013 13:13, Hu Tao ha scritto:
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
I don't think this feature is worth breaking backwards migration
compatibility. It is usually handled at a
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:30:48AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/02/2013 13:13, Hu Tao ha scritto:
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
I don't think this feature is worth
On 03/01/2013 12:36 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:12:37PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/28/2013 05:13 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
What
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
See following example:
# save two vms: one is running, the other is paused
(qemu) info status
VM status: running
(qemu) savevm running
(qemu) stop
On 02/28/2013 05:13 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
What happens if a management app wants to override the runstate when
restoring the domain? I can think of
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:12:37PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/28/2013 05:13 AM, Hu Tao wrote:
This patch enables preservation of cpu runstate during save/load vm.
So when a vm is restored from snapshot, the cpu runstate is restored,
too.
What happens if a management app wants to