On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:41:54PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 19:26:25 -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Awesome. So, if Qemu and libvirt disagrees, libvirt will know that and
add the necessary flags? That was my main worry. If disagreement between
Qemu and libvirt is
On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 16:07 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
On 03/07/2012 03:26 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Thanks a lot for the explanations, Daniel.
Comments about specific items inline.
- How can we make sure there is no confusion between libvirt and Qemu
about the CPU models?
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 04:07:06PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
(Do we have any case of capability-querying being made using QMP before
starting any actual VM, today?)
Right now, we have two levels of queries - the 'qemu -help' and 'qemu
-device ?' output is gathered up front (we really
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 19:26:25 -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Awesome. So, if Qemu and libvirt disagrees, libvirt will know that and
add the necessary flags? That was my main worry. If disagreement between
Qemu and libvirt is not a problem, it would make things much easier.
...but:
Is
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:27:53PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for the long message, but I didn't find a way to summarize the
questions and issues and make it shorter.
For people who don't know me: I have started to work recently on the
Qemu CPU model code. I have been looking
Thanks a lot for the explanations, Daniel.
Comments about specific items inline.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 02:18:28PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I have two main points I would like to understand/discuss:
1) The relationship between libvirt's cpu_map.xml and the Qemu CPU model
On 03/07/2012 03:26 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Thanks a lot for the explanations, Daniel.
Comments about specific items inline.
- How can we make sure there is no confusion between libvirt and Qemu
about the CPU models? For example, what if cpu_map.xml says model
'Moo' has the
