On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:00:11AM +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
@Paolo et al. regarding RC releases, lets hold on this idea for now.
We need to give Werner time to get used to the maintenance release
process before we add further complications. We can certainly do it
for the upcoming 1.8
Hi
But I have no idea the best moment QGIS dev should release the 1.7.3, anyway.
@Werner I would suggest to follow the concensus of waiting for a week
or so so that any further fixes can be applied, and then making a
1.7.3 release.
@Paolo et al. regarding RC releases, lets hold on this idea
Il 02/12/2011 10:00, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
@Werner I would suggest to follow the concensus of waiting for a week
or so so that any further fixes can be applied, and then making a
1.7.3 release.
@Paolo et al. regarding RC releases, lets hold on this idea for now.
We need to give Werner
On 12/02/2011 10:19 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Il 02/12/2011 10:00, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
@Werner I would suggest to follow the concensus of waiting for a week
or so so that any further fixes can be applied, and then making a
1.7.3 release.
@Paolo et al. regarding RC releases, lets hold on
And as always .. I should also give the URL ;))
http://hub.qgis.org/wiki/quantum-gis/BackportingBugs
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Le mercredi 30 novembre 2011 13:09:08, Paolo Cavallini a écrit :
What event could make it impossible to release 1.7.whatever ?
I didn't mean a specific event.
It's just impossible to make a release for every bug that has been
fixed. Therefore my proposition to wait a bit until other
On Nov 30, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Giuseppe Sucameli wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
What event could make it impossible to release 1.7.whatever ?
Is QGis reputation
I think we should use the RC approach from now on.
I agree on the RC approach, there are many people of there (intense
gis/gqis users) that I know would be able to serve as testers during the
RC phase.
cheers
-- Giovanni --
___
Qgis-developer
A team of
committed users (not developers so that the tests are independent)
would be very useful,
has this ever done or is it maybe routinely done already?
As I said in previous e-mail, I agree that it woild be better to have a
RC approach together with a team of users/testers.
cheers
--
Hi,
I agree with this approach. And I am available to participate as an RC tester.
Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio
- Original Message -
From: Giovanni Manghi
A team of
committed users (not developers so that the tests are independent)
would be very useful,
has this ever done
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:38:12AM +0100, Giuseppe Sucameli wrote:
On Nov 30, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Giuseppe Sucameli wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
What event
What event could make it impossible to release 1.7.whatever ?
I didn't mean a specific event.
It's just impossible to make a release for every bug that has been fixed.
Therefore my proposition to wait a bit until other critical bugs have shown up.
Regards,
Marco
On 29.11.2011 23:08, Sandro
I'm out until Saturday but i agree in both views..
1. We should stabilize and bugclean 1.7.2 and release a new 1.7.3 (1.8.0?)
soon..
2. We should wait a bit to catch as many bugs as possible
Alexander is so kind and offered his help in applying patches.. so if
anyone else would help a bit I'd
Hi,
Sorry for jumping in the discussion here without all the background. Maybe
this has been discussed before by the qgis dev team (if that's the case,
disregard what follows), but why not considering beta and RC stages, before
declaring an official release ? Lots of projects do that, manily
Hi all.
Road graph plugin gives wrong results if the OTF reprojection is
enabled. This is correct in Master: could the fix be backported in 1.7.3?
And, could the 1.7.3 be released ASAP?
Thanks.
--
Paolo Cavallini
See: http://www.faunalia.it/pc
___
And, could the 1.7.3 be released ASAP?
Shouldn't we wait another week or maybe even a bit longer? I'm just
afraid that we are going to find other critical bugs in this time and
maybe there will not be the possibility to release 1.7.4 then.
Regards,
Marco
On 29.11.2011 14:40, Paolo
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:53:16PM +0100, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
And, could the 1.7.3 be released ASAP?
Shouldn't we wait another week or maybe even a bit longer? I'm just
afraid that we are going to find other critical bugs in this time
and maybe there will not be the possibility to
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:53:16PM +0100, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
And, could the 1.7.3 be released ASAP?
maybe there will not be the possibility to release 1.7.4 then.
What event could make it impossible to release
Il 30/11/2011 00:01, Giuseppe Sucameli ha scritto:
Is QGis reputation enough? ;)
I agree with try to release it ASAP, but
+1 to wait another week instead of release another broken version.
And would be good doing 2-3 days of _further_ tests before
the call for packaging as well.
IMHO we
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:01:40AM +0100, Giuseppe Sucameli wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Sandro Santilli s...@keybit.net wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:53:16PM +0100, Marco Hugentobler wrote:
And, could the 1.7.3 be released ASAP?
maybe there will not be the possibility to
20 matches
Mail list logo
