Hi Thierry,
yes, it is true I put Trap #$e and Trap #$f as debug brakepoints and
sometimes forget to remove them. However, they should be ignored if
no debugger exists - otherwise there would have been massive problems
in the past.
I checked QMENU 8.01 for these traps but I did not find
- Original Message -
From: George Gwilt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] The forgotten half
On 20 Oct 2008, at 19:06, Geoff Wicks wrote:
Realistically we are probably talking about up to a fortnight
before
On 20 Oct 2008, at 19:06, Geoff Wicks wrote:
Realistically we are probably talking about up to a fortnight before
you get your QL Today.
Perhaps it should be QL Tomorrow.
Please don't say that George.
Tomorrow never comes (;-0)
Best Wishes,
Geoff
I'm so glad this has all ended in good
Dilwyn,
In theory the Windows Remote Assistance should work.
However, it is not any good for anyone who is using a router at home as to
get it to work they have to configure it to allow specific inbound ports - a
task beyond the sort of people who you are probably trying to help.
You might
In theory the Windows Remote Assistance should work.
However, it is not any good for anyone who is using a router at home as to
get it to work they have to configure it to allow specific inbound ports -
a
task beyond the sort of people who you are probably trying to help.
Ah, exactly the kind
Yes, - the moment you have a router then you are going to need to do special
configuring to allow connections from outside to access your local hardware.
The issue is that although the basic problem is generic virtually every
brand of router differs in the details of how one sets it up. Most
Dilwyn Jones wrote, On 22/10/08 19:50:
I would agree. I use LogMeIn regularly and it is very simple to set up.
On 22/10/2008 17:02, Dave Walker wrote:
You might want to look instead at the LogMeIn product as this does lot
require that kind of special network setup. This is the latest
On 22/10/2008 19:50, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
On 22/10/2008 17:02, Dave Walker wrote:
You might want to look instead at the LogMeIn product as this
does lot require that kind of special network setup.
OK, I downloaded it and installed it. Not straightforward - all sorts
of things went wrong,
Dilwyn,
The remote control facility is always available. For the first month they
let you try out the items that are in the version you pay for as well such
as remote printing, file transfer etc.
I can tell you from experience that LogMeIn is less trouble than any of the
other options. Not
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Clip
The Chapel picture now doesn't show at all but the Quanta logo image is
present in all its glory.
As the smaller pictures are all rescaled on the page to 160x120px there
is no need to retain the 640x480 size. It might be
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geoff
Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: QL-Users list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] The forgotten half
I'm so glad this has all ended in
Malcolm Cadman wrote, On 22/10/08 19:36:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Clip
snip
I still haven't fixed the Chapel image, though.
Off line, it all works perfectly, of course .
The html is fine. The image name is southw1.jpg in the webroot:
IMG
On 22/10/2008 19:36, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Will that mean that they become a fixed size ? So, the right mouse
click will not bring up the full image ; if requested by the user ?
This method does mean having two copies of each picture on the site -
one reduced and cropped to 160x120px, with
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 19:53:14 Malcolm Cadman wrote:
OK.
To kick the debate off ... how many people are regularly attending at
Quanta Group local meetings ?
I organise the London Group meetings, for example, and the attendance
now is only a small handful, when it could still be (
Dilwyn Jones a écrit :
I would agree. I use LogMeIn regularly and it is very simple to set up.
On 22/10/2008 17:02, Dave Walker wrote:
You might want to look instead at the LogMeIn product as this does lot
require that kind of special network setup. This is the latest
incarnation
of what
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:13:41 +0200, SMSQ wrote:
Hi Thierry,
yes, it is true I put Trap #$e and Trap #$f as debug brakepoints and
sometimes forget to remove them. However, they should be ignored if
no debugger exists - otherwise there would have been massive problems
in the past.
I
The remote control facility is always available. For the first month
they
let you try out the items that are in the version you pay for as well such
as remote printing, file transfer etc.
OK.
I can tell you from experience that LogMeIn is less trouble than any of
the
other options.
They
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi,
From Dilwyn's description is does not seem that Log-Me-In is that easy
to use.
I would think, also, that his reference to the Anti-Virus will be
allowing to pass through a Firewall.
Dilwyn,
The remote control
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Southern
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Wednesday 22 October 2008 19:53:14 Malcolm Cadman wrote:
OK.
To kick the debate off ... how many people are regularly attending at
Quanta Group local meetings ?
I organise the London Group meetings, for example, and the
Sorry to contradict you, but ARGOS (Thor XVI) is one such system that
would halt the job on such a uninitialized TRAP, dumping all the
registers to the screen and setting the priority of the offending job
to 0...
... the later versions (7.6 +) of QMENU (the ones Bob referred to)
refuse to load
20 matches
Mail list logo
