HI,
I've released a new version of SMSQmulator this mornong.
Apart from a small bugfix, this nox implments copying to/from the
clipboard to the Scrap thing.
The manual shows how this can easily be automated via a hotkey.
Have fun
WOlfgang
___
Hi,
I've changed a small thing in SMSQE 3.14 (George Gwilt's bugfix).
This doesn't warrant a version change - If you've recently gotten
v.3.14, re-download it, please.
Wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Hi
I have done some simple speed tests between QPC2 and SMSQmulator.
The system I am running on is a WINdoes XP with service pack 3. On as
2.93GHz Celeron processor with 2G of ram. With NORTON 360 running in the
background, that is my firewall and anti virus program.
From clicking on the
On a 3.4Ghz PhenomII, 64bit linux and openJDK 1.6 the emulator starts in
less than two seconds,
your little test finishes in 4 seconds.
The demo version of QPC2 seems to run 5.5 times faster than the emulator.
Running some of the benchmark programs available for the QL, the emulator
comes
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I'm sorry, due to the recent loss of my father I was not in the mood
to participate in any discussions. Just a short answer:
I'm very sorry to hear of your loss, Marcel. Please accept my condolences.
Thank you all. In the end he was responsible for introducing me to his
Hi,
Hmm, the enormous speed differences (w/r to QPC) baffle me.
Here, QPC is about 8-10 times faster, but that's it (which is still a
great lot faster!).
Apparently, a (single core?) Celeron really slows SMSQmulator down.
If I had had those speeds when developing - SMSQmulator wouldn't have
Hi Wolfgang,
Re your:
If I had had those speeds when developing - SMSQmulator wouldn't have
seen the light of day.
--
I realised that after I posted here - a few days ago - that I forgot to say
'congratulations' to you on SMSQum'.
May I
Well... really good product, nothing to say. Speed index is 50 times
normal QL that is far more than necessary. It is now becoming
embarrassing when I want to start a session with QL and I need to decide
what system to use : QPC or SMSQmulator ???. My Q60 is sitting at home
.and I am never
From: ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com [ql-users-boun...@lists.q-v-d.com] on
behalf of Fabrizio Diversi [bri...@yahoo.it]
Sent: 26 January 2013 18:15
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator
now there is only to remove 35
Dear Wolfgang
Regardless of how disappointed you are on the resulting speed I think
you have done a great job in producing a java emulation for the QL. At
very least it makes it easier for people to try the QL.
The java emulations are going to be slow because the Java virtual
machine is
10 matches
Mail list logo
