On 15 Sep 2013 at 17:29, Mark Martin wrote:
Having a full fledge ethernet interface without the socket limitations of
the WIZnet type of chips is an intriguing notion. I wonder if it will have
any impact on the amount of work the get a working uIP type stack -- uIP
doing things like packet
- Original Message -
From: Peter Graf pg...@q40.de
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 3:41 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] Q68
Malcolm Lear wrote:
I really like the idea of the Q68. Of all these options its the only
one I'd go out and buy. What sort of CPU speed are
WILLIAM WAUGH wrote:
Not sure what bit of BT you tried, I usually use this
http://www.thephonebook.bt.com/publisha.content/en/search/residential
/search.publisha
Thanks, Bill. I've tried that before but it seems that not all residents are
listed in their directory.
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
try www.thephonebook.bt.com
gives phone numbers and addresses unless ex-directory.
Thanks, Dilwyn. That's the same service as suggested by Bill.
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Peter Graf wrote:
Life has changed, time has become even shorter nowadays. It is absolutely
unrealistic that all my projects can be released someday. But maybe I can
rescue at least *one* of them, before all work is lost forever.
Peter, there's a quite experienced and very active group (tied
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Peter pg...@q40.de wrote:
How to get connected to the CPU bus is always the biggest problem with the
original QL, as using extension bus makes things big and ugly.
Using ROM slot takes away write access. And simulating writes with address
lines is not
Hi Urs,
Peter, there's a quite experienced and very active group (tied together by a
forum) of Sinclair related hardware hackers in Germany. Their members
recently developed and produced - among other projects - a very well done
ZX80 replica and some other nice hardware. See:
