Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote:
As I said in the other place, if you do this and use a WD1772, you might
get temperamental results. The VL1772 by VLSI is far more overclockable and
runs significantly cooler when double clocked.
I read that the "02-02" stepping of the WD1772 can safely do HD,
Dave Park via Ql-Users wrote:
> As I said in the other place, if you do this and use a WD1772, you might
> get temperamental results. The VL1772 by VLSI is far more overclockable and
> runs significantly cooler when double clocked.
I read that the "02-02" stepping of the WD1772 can safely do HD,
