On 17/03/16 11:11, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Actually I can tell a lot about programmers through the way they
structure and indent their code. Except the missing spaces in the for
loop in line 428 this is as spotless as I've ever seen it ;)
Are you sure you were looking at my code? ;-) (But
On 17 Mar 2016 at 11:33, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> pg...@q40.de wrote:
> > Thanks for the nice essay. A few remarks:
> >
> > The "LOWRAM" mode of the Q40/Q60, where read access at $0 to $17FFF
> > is mapped to shadow RAM, was mostly used for ROM emulation in the
> > early days. The Q60 had to use
pg...@q40.de wrote:
> Thanks for the nice essay. A few remarks:
>
> The "LOWRAM" mode of the Q40/Q60, where read access at $0 to $17FFF
> is mapped to shadow RAM, was mostly used for ROM emulation in the
> early days. The Q60 had to use two 16 bit EPROMs, because the design
> rule was strictly
Someone once said the same about my SupeBasic code too, I think it was my
QSAVE'd file decoder, but I might be wrong. I think it's on Dilwyn's site
somewhere.
It's at http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/docs/formats/index.html under 'SAV file
format' but it's not Norman's original. It was slightly hacked
Marcel Kilgus wrote:
> For anybody interested: I've just written a short essay about the low
> level boot process of SMSQ/E for anybody daring enough to try to
> understand it:
>
> http://www.kilgus.net/2016/03/17/smsqe-boot-sequence/
>
> Cheers, Marcel
Thanks for the nice essay. A few
I won't pretend I understood all of it by any means, but interesting to read
all the same.
And congratulations on the new look website - very nice.
Dilwyn
-Original Message-
From: Marcel Kilgus
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:00 AM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: [Ql-Users] SMSQ/E
On 17/03/16 12:09, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
It was slightly hacked by me to
add one or two SBASIC extras such as binary and hex constants, so it
might not be up to Norman's usual standards (I can't remember exactly
how many changes I made...) 8-|
I think, if I remember, that you fixed it for
For anybody interested: I've just written a short essay about the low
level boot process of SMSQ/E for anybody daring enough to try to
understand it:
http://www.kilgus.net/2016/03/17/smsqe-boot-sequence/
Cheers, Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
What I miss in TT's rewritten QSAVE/QLOAD things is the message "xxx xxx xxx
Extensions missing" as it was with the original QSAVE/QLOAD, if extensions
used in the _sav were not pre-loaded.
This was always very helpful.
Cheers...Ralf
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Dunbar"
On
On 17/03/16 10:47, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Not sure how much I'll really use the blog, but it might come handy
now and then, like it has now.
I use mine to make up for a deficiency in remembering stuff. I keep
trying to learn new stuff, so the older stuff "ages out of the cache"!
I had to do
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> I won't pretend I understood all of it by any means, but interesting to read
> all the same.
>
> And congratulations on the new look website - very nice.
Thanks :-) 18 years ago I did my first web page and I think this one
is the first one looking halfway decent ;-) I
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> I had to do some C programming recently, and I was completely unable to
> get started after "int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {" - I simply
> couldn't remember! I got there in the end -
> https://github.com/NormanDunbar/TraceMiner - but the C quality is
> probably
12 matches
Mail list logo
