Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 08/10/15 19:07, Graeme Gregory wrote: Fixed qltools is here https://github.com/slimlogic/qltools Thanks Graeme, I've been looking for a decent version of qltools for some time to use on Linux. David - if you are interested - the reason that qltools.c won't compile without warnings on

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread David Gilham
Thanks Norman You have also given a hint fo qxltools. I am using Gcc v 4.8.4 on my box and will ateempt to modify qxltools unless someone else has done so already. On 9 October 2015 at 13:29, Norman Dunbar wrote: > On 09/10/15 12:39, Graeme Gregory wrote: > >> >> I have

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 04:51 PM, Norman Dunbar wrote: > On 09/10/15 16:47, David Gilham wrote: > > Thanks Norman You have also given a hint fo qxltools. > > I am using Gcc v 4.8.4 on my box and will ateempt to modify qxltools unless > > someone else has done so already. > > Hi David, > > I've

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 09/10/15 16:47, David Gilham wrote: Thanks Norman You have also given a hint fo qxltools. I am using Gcc v 4.8.4 on my box and will ateempt to modify qxltools unless someone else has done so already. Hi David, I've not made any changes to the qxltools on the grounds that I don't,

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 09/10/15 09:43, Norman Dunbar wrote: On 08/10/15 19:07, Graeme Gregory wrote: Fixed qltools is here https://github.com/slimlogic/qltools Thanks Graeme, I've been looking for a decent version of qltools for some time to use on Linux. Given that I had a bit of time this morning while

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 11:43 AM, Norman Dunbar wrote: > On 09/10/15 09:43, Norman Dunbar wrote: > > On 08/10/15 19:07, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > >> Fixed qltools is here > >> > >> https://github.com/slimlogic/qltools > > > > Thanks Graeme, I've been looking for a decent version of qltools for

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 01:29 PM, Norman Dunbar wrote: > On 09/10/15 12:39, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > I have replied to your pull request through github. Some some small > > comments. > > > Ok, they are fixed now, I'll sort out another pull request. > > > Addressing one of your other

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 09/10/15 12:39, Graeme Gregory wrote: I have replied to your pull request through github. Some some small comments. Ok, they are fixed now, I'll sort out another pull request. Addressing one of your other comments on github publically here you can use linux to generate the windows

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 01:35 PM, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, at 01:29 PM, Norman Dunbar wrote: > > On 09/10/15 12:39, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > > > I have replied to your pull request through github. Some some small > > > comments. > > > > > Ok, they are fixed now, I'll

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-09 Thread Norman Dunbar
On 09/10/15 14:16, Graeme Gregory wrote: Hi Norman, Should be fixed now, have tested the resulting .exe on windows and it seems to work. Was just missing a couple of #if defined(__MINGW32__) Graeme Good stuff, thanks. Cheers, Norm. -- Norman Dunbar Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd Registered

Re: [Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-08 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, at 07:03 PM, David Gilham wrote: > It would seem that the versions of the above in the Distribution archive > though the compile with warnings under linex on a ^4 bit amd platform > they do not seem to function properly. I am trying them on 64 bit Linux > on an IBM Thinkpad.

[Ql-Users] qxltool and qltols

2015-10-08 Thread David Gilham
It would seem that the versions of the above in the Distribution archive though the compile with warnings under linex on a ^4 bit amd platform they do not seem to function properly. I am trying them on 64 bit Linux on an IBM Thinkpad. Has anyone else either fixed them or has pointers to how to fix