On 13 Sep 2006, at 16:56, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
On a similar subject, whats the average age of you guys... Don't
lie, I've seen the pictures :-)
My average age is 26. Which, coincidentally, is currently also my
upper and lower bounds! ;-)
But that was yesterday!
George
I reckon if you run SMSQ on a machine with Godl Card or Super Gold
Card
then it would all work OK. It seems SMSQ has easy http support.
Now *displaying* is a different matter (8-)#
Regarding this matter. Whilst i can see that it would be difficult for
a relative novice like me to
write a text
Neil Riley wrote:
Regarding this matter. Whilst i can see that it would be difficult
for a relative novice like me to write a text based browser, I guess
i can be simplistic in my approach and see the HTTP as being a file
that follows a logical structure.
HTTP is just the transfer protocol
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Neil Riley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I reckon if you run SMSQ on a machine with Godl Card or Super Gold
Card
then it would all work OK. It seems SMSQ has easy http support.
Now *displaying* is a different matter (8-)#
Regarding this matter. Whilst i can see that it
Neil Riley writes:
On a similar subject, whats the average age of you guys... Don't
lie, I've seen the pictures :-)
as a starter for ten, I was born the year we last won the world cup so
the average currently stands
at 40, any advance ! :-p
Ive been 40 these past 10 years. Marcel must
P Witte wrote:
Ive been 40 these past 10 years. Marcel must be cheating though.
Surely his /average/ age is only 13?
I just knew some old geezer will try to ruin my little joke with
statistics. Thought I would have guessed it to be Jim!
So there, having insulted both Per and Jim, my work here
I seem to remember these items appearing originally. Are they still used
today, are they still relevant or are they museum pieces. If still in
use
what sort of broardband connection is required, for example, dial up
or broadband and if dial up is that still available !?
Ok, assuming these
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Tandata Modem Q Con + Q Mod
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:35 +0100, Neil Riley wrote:
I seem to remember these items appearing originally. Are they still used
today or are they museum pieces?
They were very slow (remember the QL serial port is only capable
David McCann wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:35 +0100, Neil Riley wrote:
I seem to remember these items appearing originally. Are they still used
today or are they museum pieces?
They were very slow (remember the QL serial port is only capable of 19K
and only reliable for reception at 9K!)
Tony,
The BBS closed down 5 years, I think, no one was using it.
I still have 2 V90 USR modems, which I guess are surplus to
requirements these days as everyone is using PC hardware
and internal PC V90 modem are less then £5
The best option was to have SuperHermes to give the fastest serial
Tony Firshman wrote:
The main problem was that the input handshake (8049 chip) was bugged.
Hermes uses the same basic hardware (but erasable firmware) and Laurence
Reeves simply coded it properly! If only he had worked for Sinclair at
the time we would have had a *much* better QL from the
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:54:03 +0100
Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derek Stewart wrote:
Tony,
The BBS closed down 5 years, I think, no one was using it.
I still have 2 V90 USR modems, which I guess are surplus to
requirements these days as everyone is using PC hardware
Tony Firshman wrote:
I reckon if you run SMSQ on a machine with Godl Card or Super Gold Card
then it would all work OK. It seems SMSQ has easy http support.
Only the QPC variant, unfortunately, as soQL seems to be fairly dead.
There are some open source light-weight TCP/IP stacks available
13 matches
Mail list logo
